https://DevOpsCloud.io -- Cloud Monk Losang Jinpa, Ph.D., MCSE/MCT, GitOps DevOps Engineer

Return to Security-Related RFCs, Network Security, Container Security - Kubernetes Security, Cloud Security, Web Security, DevSecOps

See: 8174 on datatracker.ietf.org

Ambiguity of Uppercase Key Words in RFCs

RFC 8174 provides clarification on the usage of uppercase key words in technical documentation, specifically in relation to the definitions established by RFC 2119. Published by the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) in 2017, RFC 8174 addresses the potential ambiguity that can arise when key words such as “MUST,” “SHOULD,” and “MAY” are used without specific context. This clarification is crucial for ensuring that technical specifications are interpreted correctly and consistently across different documents, preventing misunderstandings in the implementation of protocols, systems, and standards.

The key purpose of RFC 8174 is to reinforce that these key words should only be used when they are intended to convey a specific level of requirement, as defined in RFC 2119. By focusing on the proper usage of these terms, RFC 8174 ensures that readers of technical documents understand the intent behind each requirement and that there is no confusion over whether a requirement is mandatory, recommended, or optional. The document also emphasizes the importance of using these key words sparingly and only when they are truly necessary to avoid overloading the document with unnecessary or redundant requirements.

In many cases, the use of uppercase key words has led to confusion because the context of their usage was not always made explicit. RFC 8174 seeks to eliminate this ambiguity by encouraging authors of technical documents to clearly define how these words are being used in each specific context. This not only improves the clarity of the document but also helps implementers understand the priority and importance of each requirement. For example, when a requirement is labeled as “MUST,” it is critical that readers understand this term as an absolute obligation rather than a recommendation or suggestion.

RFC 8174 also stresses the importance of consistency across documents. As multiple technical specifications may reference each other or build upon previous standards, it is important that the use of uppercase key words is consistent across these documents to maintain clarity and avoid conflicts. When these terms are used inconsistently or without clear definition, it can lead to confusion and errors in the implementation of standards, potentially compromising the reliability and interoperability of systems.

One of the central themes of RFC 8174 is the need for explicitness in the use of key words. The document advises authors to clearly state when the terms “MUST,” “SHOULD,” and “MAY” are being used in accordance with RFC 2119. This ensures that readers are aware that the key words are being used with their defined meanings and are not simply part of normal descriptive text. RFC 8174 encourages authors to include a specific note in the introduction or preamble of their documents to indicate that the key words are being used according to RFC 2119 standards.

Additionally, RFC 8174 addresses the potential for misinterpretation when uppercase key words are used in non-normative sections of a document. Non-normative sections are typically used to provide additional information, guidance, or examples, but they do not impose mandatory requirements. When key words such as “MUST” or “SHOULD” appear in these sections, it can create confusion about whether the text is intended to impose an obligation or simply provide a recommendation. RFC 8174 advises authors to avoid using uppercase key words in non-normative sections unless they are clearly marked as examples or explanatory notes.

The impact of RFC 8174 extends beyond the immediate technical community. By providing a clear and consistent framework for the use of key words in technical documentation, it helps ensure that standards and protocols are implemented correctly by developers, engineers, and system administrators. This, in turn, improves the reliability and interoperability of systems across different platforms and environments, reducing the risk of errors, security vulnerabilities, and operational issues.

RFC 8174 also reinforces the principles of RFC 2119, which established the original definitions for key words used in IETF documents. While RFC 2119 provided the foundational definitions, RFC 8174 builds upon this by addressing specific areas where confusion has arisen over the years. This clarification is particularly important as more complex and interconnected systems are developed, making it essential that all parties involved in the design, development, and implementation of these systems share a common understanding of the requirements.

The key terms defined in RFC 2119—“MUST,” “MUST NOT,” “SHOULD,” “SHOULD NOT,” and “MAY”—remain the cornerstone of technical specifications. However, RFC 8174 ensures that these terms are used appropriately and that their meanings are not diluted or misinterpreted in various contexts. By providing additional guidance on how these terms should be applied, RFC 8174 contributes to the ongoing effort to improve the quality and clarity of technical documentation within the IETF and beyond.

RFC 8174 also encourages the use of lowercase key words when the terms are not being used in their normative sense. For example, if an author wants to use the word “must” in a descriptive or explanatory context but does not intend for it to carry the weight of a formal requirement, RFC 8174 recommends using lowercase to avoid confusion. This distinction between uppercase and lowercase key words helps ensure that readers can easily differentiate between normative and non-normative statements in the document.

In the years since its publication, RFC 8174 has been widely adopted by technical writers, standards organizations, and software developers to improve the quality of technical specifications. Its guidance on key word usage has become a best practice, not only within the IETF but also in other industries that rely on clear and unambiguous technical standards. By providing a consistent framework for interpreting key words, RFC 8174 has helped reduce the risk of miscommunication and has contributed to the overall success of many technical projects.

Furthermore, RFC 8174 underscores the importance of carefully considering the audience of technical documents. When writing specifications that will be implemented by a broad and diverse group of developers, engineers, and organizations, it is essential to use clear and precise language. RFC 8174 helps authors achieve this by providing clear guidance on how to use key words in a way that minimizes the potential for misinterpretation and confusion.

Finally, RFC 8174 emphasizes that the use of key words should not be arbitrary or excessive. Overuse of key words such as “MUST” or “SHOULD” can lead to documents that are overly rigid or prescriptive, potentially stifling innovation or flexibility in implementation. RFC 8174 encourages authors to carefully consider the necessity of each key word and to use them only when they are truly required to define essential behaviors or operations.

RFC 8174 provides crucial clarification on the use of uppercase key words in technical documentation, building on the definitions established in RFC 2119. By encouraging clear, consistent, and explicit usage of terms like “MUST,” “SHOULD,” and “MAY,” RFC 8174 ensures that technical specifications are easier to interpret and implement. Its emphasis on reducing ambiguity and maintaining consistency across documents has improved the quality of technical standards, contributing to more reliable and interoperable systems across the Internet and beyond. The adoption of RFC 8174 has had a lasting impact on technical writing, helping to create clear and unambiguous documentation that meets the needs of developers and implementers.

Official documentation: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8174