Table of Contents
Misconfigured Maven
Don't Return to Misconfigured Package Management (Misconfigured Gradle, Misconfigured NPM)
TLDR: Misconfigured Maven setups occur when dependency management, build configurations, or plugin settings are improperly implemented in Java projects, leading to vulnerabilities, inefficiencies, or build failures. Common issues include using outdated dependencies, improperly configured `pom.xml` files, and excessive plugin executions. Properly configuring Maven ensures secure and reliable project builds.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apache_Maven
A misconfigured Maven project might include outdated or vulnerable dependencies in the `pom.xml` file, exposing applications to known security risks. Using improperly scoped dependencies, such as including test libraries in production builds, can result in bloated applications or runtime errors. Additionally, failing to configure plugins correctly, such as those for packaging or testing, can lead to inefficiencies or failed builds. Tools like `mvn dependency:analyze` and OWASP Dependency-Check help identify and resolve such issues in Maven projects.
https://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-dependency-plugin/usage.html
To secure and optimize Maven configurations, developers should ensure dependency versions are specified and locked in the `pom.xml` file and regularly audit them for vulnerabilities using tools like Snyk or `mvn dependency:tree`. Minimizing unnecessary dependencies and ensuring that plugins are used efficiently reduces build times and security risks. Adopting secure coding practices and adhering to frameworks like CIS Benchmarks enhances the reliability and safety of Maven-managed Java projects.
In Depth
TLDR: Misconfigured Maven, introduced in 2004 by the Apache Software Foundation, can expose applications to vulnerabilities such as supply chain attacks, data leakage, and denial of service attacks. These risks arise from improper dependency resolution, insecure repository configurations, and lack of validation mechanisms, violating several OWASP Top Ten principles, including Input Validation, Access Controls, and secure Policy Enforcement.
Improper input validation in Maven’s `pom.xml` files can allow attackers to introduce malicious dependencies into a project. For instance, unverified configurations or injected dependencies from external sources can compromise the application. Adhering to strict validation of dependency metadata aligns with OWASP Top Ten guidelines on Input Validation.
https://owasp.org/www-community/Input_Validation
Neglecting to secure private Maven repositories can result in unauthorized publishing or modification of dependencies. Implementing strong Access Controls with authentication mechanisms ensures that only authorized personnel can access and modify the repository, meeting OWASP Top Ten’s Access Management standards.
https://owasp.org/www-community/Access_Control
Failing to update dependencies in Maven projects regularly leaves applications vulnerable to known exploits. Utilizing tools that enable alerts for vulnerable components and automate dependency upgrades ensures adherence to OWASP Top Ten’s proactive security practices.
https://owasp.org/www-project-dependency-check/
Unrestricted use of public repositories, such as Maven Central, without validation exposes projects to supply chain attacks. Restricting dependencies to trusted sources through allowlists ensures compliance with OWASP Top Ten's Policy Enforcement principles.
https://owasp.org/www-community/OWASP_API_Security_Project
Logging unredacted details, such as repository URLs or credentials during Maven operations, increases the risk of data leakage. Adopting secure Logging practices, including masking sensitive fields, ensures compliance with OWASP Top Ten standards for monitoring and auditing.
https://owasp.org/www-community/Logging_and_Monitoring_Cheat_Sheet
Over-reliance on Maven’s Framework Defaults can lead to permissive dependency resolution, such as allowing transitive dependencies without validation. Customizing configurations to enforce strict dependency management aligns with OWASP Top Ten’s secure Framework Defaults principles.
https://owasp.org/www-community/Framework_Security_Project
Failing to enforce cryptographic verification for dependencies in Maven repositories increases the risk of downloading tampered packages. Ensuring that all dependencies are verified using PGP signatures complies with OWASP Top Ten's Data Encryption and integrity protection standards.
https://owasp.org/www-community/Data_Encryption
Excessive use of Maven dependencies without imposing limits on the dependency tree size or complexity can lead to denial of service attacks. Enforcing constraints on the size and depth of dependency graphs mitigates this risk, adhering to OWASP Top Ten’s resource management recommendations.
https://owasp.org/www-community/Denial_of_Service
Neglecting to sandbox build scripts or post-installation actions in Maven projects can result in remote code execution (RCE). Ensuring that all scripts are executed in a secure, isolated environment complies with OWASP Top Ten guidelines for secure resource management.
https://owasp.org/www-community/attacks/Code_Injection
Finally, failing to segregate Maven configurations between development and production environments can lead to the introduction of unverified dependencies in production. Adopting environment-specific configurations ensures alignment with OWASP Top Ten operational best practices.
Apache Maven: Maven Central, choco install maven, brew install maven, Build Tools, Package Managers and Dependency Management, Gradle, Maven GitHub, Awesome Maven. (navbar_maven - see also navbar_gradle, navbar_package manager)
Cloud Monk is Retired ( for now). Buddha with you. © 2025 and Beginningless Time - Present Moment - Three Times: The Buddhas or Fair Use. Disclaimers
SYI LU SENG E MU CHYWE YE. NAN. WEI LA YE. WEI LA YE. SA WA HE.