Table of Contents
XML-RPC
Return to Remote Procedure Call (RPC), XML, Remote API
See: https://www.dokuwiki.org/devel:xmlrpc and DokuWiki Synchronization Plugin
The protocol underlying XML-RPC is described in several documents, but its closest related standard for internet procedures can be found in RFC 3023, which covers XML media types. While XML-RPC itself is not directly tied to an RFC, its usage and format are built upon XML, which has several associated RFCs like RFC 3023. XML-RPC is a remote procedure call (RPC) protocol encoded in XML, allowing for simple remote function calls to be made over HTTP between a client and server. The protocol's simplicity makes it easy to implement and has been widely used in web services as a lightweight alternative to more complex systems like SOAP or REST.
XML-RPC Protocol Overview
XML-RPC is a protocol designed for executing remote procedure calls using XML to encode the data and HTTP as the transport protocol. The concept of remote procedure calls (RPC) allows one system to invoke a procedure or function on another system over a network. In the case of XML-RPC, this is done by wrapping the procedure call in an XML structure, sending it over HTTP, and receiving the response as another XML document. This method is simple and lightweight, which has contributed to its popularity in the early days of web services before the rise of more robust standards like SOAP and REST.
The structure of an XML-RPC request is relatively straightforward. An XML document contains a root `<methodCall>` element that encloses the `<methodName>` (representing the function to be invoked) and `<params>`, which include the arguments being passed to the method. The response is similarly structured, with a root `<methodResponse>` element that contains either a `<params>` element with the return value or a `<fault>` element indicating an error. The use of XML for encoding data is specified in RFC 3023, which defines the media types used for XML documents transmitted over the internet.
Because XML-RPC uses HTTP as its transport mechanism, it is naturally suited for web-based applications. HTTP provides the advantage of being widely supported by firewalls and proxies, which means XML-RPC calls can typically pass through corporate networks without additional configuration. This makes XML-RPC an accessible choice for developers who need to implement remote procedure calls in distributed systems or web applications. Furthermore, the reliance on existing HTTP infrastructure aligns with established standards in web communication, contributing to XML-RPC's simplicity and widespread adoption.
The parameters passed in an XML-RPC call can include basic data types like integers, strings, and booleans, as well as more complex structures such as arrays and structs. XML-RPC supports nested data structures, allowing complex objects to be passed between client and server. However, this flexibility comes at a cost in terms of performance. XML is a verbose format, and encoding complex data structures in XML can result in significant overhead, especially when compared to more efficient binary serialization formats like Protocol Buffers or MessagePack. Nevertheless, the human-readable nature of XML has been one of its strengths, making it easier for developers to debug and understand the data being transmitted.
The simplicity of XML-RPC also means that it lacks some of the advanced features found in more complex protocols like SOAP or REST. For example, XML-RPC does not have built-in support for authentication or session management. Instead, these features must be implemented separately, typically by using the underlying HTTP mechanisms such as Basic Authentication or OAuth. Additionally, error handling in XML-RPC is limited to returning a fault code and a string message, which may not provide enough detail for debugging complex issues. Despite these limitations, XML-RPC's straightforward approach has made it a popular choice for simple remote procedure calls in many applications.
XML-RPC predates many modern web service protocols and was one of the earliest attempts to standardize remote procedure calls over the internet. Its development in the late 1990s coincided with the rise of the web as a platform for distributed computing. At the time, developers were seeking ways to enable communication between systems over the web, and XML-RPC provided a lightweight, easy-to-implement solution. As web services evolved, more feature-rich protocols like SOAP emerged, building on the basic concepts of XML-RPC but adding additional layers of complexity, such as formal service definitions through WSDL and advanced security mechanisms.
Despite the advent of newer technologies, XML-RPC is still in use today, particularly in legacy systems and lightweight applications where simplicity is more important than advanced features. Many programming languages have libraries that support XML-RPC, making it easy to integrate into existing codebases. Some content management systems (CMS), such as WordPress, still provide XML-RPC endpoints to enable remote interaction with their systems, although this has become less common with the rise of REST-based APIs. XML-RPC's continued presence in certain applications demonstrates its durability as a protocol, even as newer technologies have taken its place in most modern web service architectures.
The primary security concern with XML-RPC is its reliance on HTTP, which, if not properly secured, can expose sensitive data to interception or tampering. To mitigate this risk, it is recommended to use HTTPS for encrypting the communication between client and server. Additionally, because XML-RPC is stateless and lacks built-in session management, developers must implement their own mechanisms for maintaining state, such as passing session tokens or using cookie-based authentication.
Conclusion
XML-RPC is a simple and efficient protocol for remote procedure calls, using XML for data serialization and HTTP for transport. While it has been largely superseded by more modern protocols like SOAP and REST, it remains a useful tool in certain scenarios, particularly in legacy systems or lightweight applications. Its ease of implementation and reliance on existing web infrastructure make it accessible to developers, although its simplicity comes with trade-offs in terms of performance and advanced features. The protocol’s foundation in established XML standards, such as those outlined in RFC 3023, ensures that it remains compatible with broader web technologies, even as the web continues to evolve.
Remote Procedure Call (RPC): gRPC and Protocol Buffers (protobuf), GraphQL, Remote API], XML-RPC, GitHub gRPC, Awesome gRPC. (navbar_grpc - see also navbar_rpc, navbar_rest)
Cloud Monk is Retired ( for now). Buddha with you. © 2025 and Beginningless Time - Present Moment - Three Times: The Buddhas or Fair Use. Disclaimers
SYI LU SENG E MU CHYWE YE. NAN. WEI LA YE. WEI LA YE. SA WA HE.