Table of Contents
Code Reviews
Code review
- Code review - MAKE SINGULAR
Return to Full-Stack Web Development, Full-Stack Developer, Code review Glossary, Code review Topics
“The code review technique assumes that the changes committed by developers are reviewed by their peers. It’s quite possible that a second look by another person with different experience and background will allow a bug that was overlooked by an original author to be caught. Code reviews are useful for more than simply catching bugs. They may also help to improve the code architecture, readability, performance, and so on. Also, code review improves knowledge sharing and mentoring inside the organization. There are books, conference talks and blog posts on how to make code reviews efficient. For example, you may read “What to Look for in a Code Review” by Trisha Gee.” (B0CTHRGJH3 2024)
Definition
Code review is a systematic examination of software source code by one or more developers other than the author to identify bugs, improve code quality, and ensure adherence to coding standards. This practice is an integral part of the software development process, promoting knowledge sharing, and enhancing the overall quality of the codebase. By having multiple developers review code, potential issues can be caught early, reducing the likelihood of bugs making it to production. Code reviews also serve as a form of mentorship, where more experienced developers can provide guidance and share best practices with their peers.
Benefits and Best Practices
The primary benefits of code review include improved code quality, enhanced security, and reduced technical debt. Regular code reviews help maintain a consistent coding style and ensure that new code aligns with the team's standards and best practices. They also provide an opportunity to catch security vulnerabilities and performance issues before they become problematic. Effective code reviews involve clear communication, constructive feedback, and a collaborative approach. Utilizing tools like GitHub pull requests or Gerrit can streamline the review process and make it more efficient. For more information, visit https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Code_review and https://smartbear.com/learn/code-review/.
- Snippet from Wikipedia: Code review
Code review (sometimes referred to as peer review) is a software quality assurance activity in which one or more people examine the source code of a computer program, either after implementation or during the development process. The persons performing the checking, excluding the author, are called "reviewers". At least one reviewer must not be the code's author.
Code review differs from related software quality assurance techniques like static code analysis, self-checks, testing, and pair programming. Static analysis relies primarily on automated tools, self-checks involve only the author, testing requires code execution, and pair programming is performed continuously during development rather than as a separate step.
Detailed Summary
Introduction
Code review is a critical practice in software development where developers systematically examine each other's code to identify errors, ensure adherence to coding standards, and improve overall code quality. This collaborative process enhances software reliability and maintains consistent coding practices across the team. Code reviews have been a fundamental aspect of software engineering since the early days of computing.
History and Origin
The concept of code review dates back to the 1970s. It was formalized by Michael Fagan in 1976 at IBM, who introduced the Fagan Inspection method. This method was one of the first structured approaches to code review, aimed at detecting defects early in the software development lifecycle. Fagan's work laid the groundwork for modern code review practices.
Purpose of Code Reviews
The primary purpose of code reviews is to ensure that code meets the team's quality standards and is free from bugs. By having multiple developers review code, issues can be identified and resolved early, reducing the likelihood of defects reaching production. Code reviews also facilitate knowledge sharing and collective ownership of the codebase.
Types of Code Reviews
There are several types of code reviews, including formal inspections, walkthroughs, and peer reviews. Formal inspections are structured and involve predefined roles and procedures. Walkthroughs are less formal and involve the author explaining the code to peers. Peer reviews are informal reviews conducted by one or more colleagues without a formal structure.
Benefits of Code Reviews
Code reviews offer numerous benefits, including improved code quality, enhanced security, and increased knowledge sharing among team members. They help maintain consistent coding standards, reduce technical debt, and improve the maintainability of the codebase. Additionally, code reviews foster a culture of collaboration and continuous improvement.
Improved Code Quality
One of the main benefits of code reviews is the improvement of code quality. Reviewers can identify potential issues, such as bugs, inefficiencies, and deviations from coding standards. This leads to cleaner, more maintainable code that is less prone to errors and easier to understand.
Enhanced Security
Code reviews play a crucial role in enhancing the security of software. Reviewers can spot security vulnerabilities, such as SQL injection and cross-site scripting (XSS), that the original developer might have missed. Addressing these issues early helps protect the software from malicious attacks.
Knowledge Sharing
Code reviews facilitate knowledge sharing among team members. Junior developers can learn best practices and coding techniques from more experienced colleagues, while senior developers can gain new perspectives and insights from their peers. This continuous exchange of knowledge helps build a more skilled and cohesive team.
Code Ownership
Through code reviews, multiple developers become familiar with different parts of the codebase, promoting collective code ownership. This reduces the risk of bottlenecks and ensures that more team members can contribute to and maintain the code, enhancing team agility and resilience.
Collaboration and Communication
Code reviews foster collaboration and improve communication within the development team. Developers must articulate their thought processes and decisions, leading to better understanding and alignment on coding standards and practices. This collaborative environment encourages teamwork and mutual respect.
Tool Support for Code Reviews
Several tools facilitate code reviews, making the process more efficient and effective. Popular tools include GitHub pull requests, GitLab merge requests, and Gerrit. These tools integrate with version control systems, allowing developers to review code changes, comment on specific lines, and approve or request changes.
Example: GitHub Pull Request
Here’s an example of a GitHub pull request for a Python function:
```python def add_numbers(a, b):
"""Adds two numbers and returns the result."""
if not isinstance(a, (int, float)) or not isinstance(b, (int, float)):
raise ValueError("Both arguments must be numbers")
return a + b
```
A reviewer might comment on the importance of adding type hints for better clarity and static analysis.
Best Practices for Code Reviews
Effective code reviews require following best practices. These include providing constructive feedback, focusing on the code rather than the developer, keeping reviews concise, and ensuring that reviews are timely. Setting clear guidelines and expectations for code reviews also helps streamline the process.
Providing Constructive Feedback
Constructive feedback is essential for effective code reviews. Reviewers should highlight both strengths and areas for improvement, offering specific suggestions for enhancement. This approach helps developers learn and grow, fostering a positive review culture.
Focusing on the Code
Code reviews should focus on the code itself, not the developer. Reviewers should avoid personal criticism and instead provide objective feedback based on coding standards and best practices. This ensures that reviews remain professional and respectful.
Timeliness of Reviews
Timely code reviews are crucial for maintaining development momentum. Delayed reviews can hinder progress and lead to merge conflicts. Teams should establish expectations for review turnaround times to ensure that code is reviewed and integrated promptly.
Example: Reviewing for Security Vulnerabilities
In the following example, a static code analysis tool might detect a potential SQL injection vulnerability:
```python def get_user_data(username):
query = f"SELECT * FROM users WHERE username = '{username}'"
# Execute the query
```
A reviewer would recommend using parameterized queries to prevent SQL injection:
```python def get_user_data(username):
query = "SELECT * FROM users WHERE username = %s" cursor.execute(query, (username,))```
Continuous Improvement
Code reviews are an opportunity for continuous improvement. Teams should regularly reflect on their review process and make adjustments as needed. This might involve updating coding standards, refining review guidelines, or adopting new tools and techniques.
Conclusion
Code review is an indispensable practice in modern software development, offering significant benefits in terms of code quality, security, and team collaboration. By following best practices and leveraging appropriate tools, development teams can effectively integrate code reviews into their workflows and reap the rewards of higher-quality software.
For more information, visit https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Code_review and https://smartbear.com/learn/code-review/.
Code review Alternatives
Return to Code review, Alternatives to
Summarize the alternatives to Code review in 14 paragraphs. Make the Wikipedia or other references URLs as raw URLs. Put a section heading for each paragraph. Section headings must start and end with 2 equals signs. Do not put double square brackets around words in section headings. You MUST ALWAYS put double square brackets around EVERY acronym, product name, company or corporation name, name of a person, country, state, place, years, dates, buzzword, slang, jargon or technical words. REMEMBER, you MUST MUST ALWAYS put double square brackets around EVERY acronym!
Fair Use Sources
- Code review for Archive Access for Fair Use Preservation, quoting, paraphrasing, excerpting and/or commenting upon
Full-Stack Web Development: JavaScript, HTML5, CSS3, React, Node.js, Angular, Vue.js, Python, Django, Java, Spring Boot, Ruby on Rails, PHP, Laravel, SQL, MySQL, PostgreSQL, MongoDB, Git, RESTful APIs, GraphQL, Docker, TypeScript, AWS, Google Cloud Platform, Azure, Express.js, Redux, Webpack, Babel, NPM, Yarn, Jenkins, CI/CD Pipelines, Kubernetes, Bootstrap, SASS, LESS, Material-UI, Flask, Firebase, Serverless Architecture, Microservices, MVC Architecture, Socket.IO, JWT, OAuth, JQuery, Containerization, Heroku, Selenium, Cypress, Mocha, Chai, Jest, ESLint, Prettier, Tailwind CSS, Ant Design, Vuetify, Next.js, Nuxt.js, Gatsby, Apollo GraphQL, Strapi, KeystoneJS, Prisma, Figma, Sketch, Adobe XD, Axios, Razor Pages, Blazor, ASP.NET Core, Entity Framework, Hibernate, Swagger, Postman, GraphQL Apollo Server, Electron, Ionic, React Native, VueX, React Router, Redux-Saga, Redux-Thunk, MobX, RxJS, Three.js, Chart.js, D3.js, Moment.js, Lodash, Underscore.js, Handlebars.js, Pug, EJS, Thymeleaf, BuiltWith.com, Popular Web Frameworks, Popular JavaScript Libraries, Awesome Full-Stack. (navbar_full_stack - see also navbar_javascript, navbar_node.js, navbar_typescript)
Code review Best Practices
See: Code review Best Practices
Return to Code review, Best Practices, Code review Anti-Patterns, Code review Security, Code review and the OWASP Top 10
Introduction
Code review is a vital practice in software development that helps ensure code quality, security, and maintainability. By following best practices, teams can make their review process more efficient and effective. This comprehensive guide covers 25 best practices for conducting successful code reviews.
Establish Clear Guidelines
Start by establishing clear guidelines for code reviews. Define the objectives, scope, and criteria for what constitutes a successful review. This helps reviewers and authors understand expectations and ensures consistency across reviews. Document these guidelines and make them easily accessible to the team.
Use a Checklist
Develop a checklist of common issues to look for during code reviews. This checklist can include items such as code style, error handling, security vulnerabilities, and performance considerations. Using a checklist helps reviewers systematically evaluate code and ensures that important aspects are not overlooked.
Limit the Scope of Each Review
Avoid overwhelming reviewers by limiting the scope of each code review. Smaller, incremental reviews are easier to manage and allow for more thorough evaluations. Aim for reviews that can be completed within an hour, focusing on a few hundred lines of code at most.
Review Code Regularly
Make code reviews a regular part of the development process. Incorporate reviews into your continuous integration (CI) pipeline and ensure that all changes are reviewed before being merged into the main branch. Regular reviews help maintain code quality and catch issues early.
Use Automation Tools
Leverage automation tools to assist with code reviews. Tools like SonarQube, ESLint, and Checkstyle can automatically detect code smells, security vulnerabilities, and style violations. These tools help reduce the burden on reviewers by handling routine checks.
Provide Constructive Feedback
Feedback during code reviews should be constructive and focused on the code, not the developer. Highlight positive aspects as well as areas for improvement. Use specific examples and suggestions to help the author understand the issue and how to address it.
Focus on Readability and Maintainability
Prioritize readability and maintainability during code reviews. Code that is easy to read and understand is also easier to maintain and debug. Ensure that code is well-organized, follows naming conventions, and includes appropriate comments and documentation.
Consider Performance Implications
Evaluate the performance implications of the code being reviewed. Look for potential bottlenecks, inefficient algorithms, and excessive resource usage. Suggest optimizations where necessary to ensure the code performs well under expected workloads.
Check for Security Issues
Identify potential security issues during code reviews. This includes looking for vulnerabilities such as SQL injection, cross-site scripting (XSS), and improper handling of sensitive data. Use security-focused tools and frameworks to assist with this task.
Encourage Pair Programming
Encourage pair programming as part of the code review process. Pair programming allows two developers to work together, with one writing the code and the other reviewing it in real-time. This practice can catch issues early and improve code quality through immediate feedback.
Example: Checking for SQL Injection
Here's an example of identifying an SQL injection vulnerability and recommending a fix:
```python
- Vulnerable code
def get_user_data(username):
query = f"SELECT * FROM users WHERE username = '{username}'"
cursor.execute(query)
- Recommended fix
def get_user_data(username):
query = "SELECT * FROM users WHERE username = %s" cursor.execute(query, (username,))```
Encourage Open Communication
Foster an environment of open communication during code reviews. Encourage reviewers and authors to ask questions, clarify assumptions, and discuss potential improvements. Open dialogue helps build understanding and fosters a collaborative team culture.
Rotate Reviewers
Rotate reviewers regularly to ensure that different team members review different parts of the codebase. This helps spread knowledge and prevents any single developer from becoming a bottleneck. It also brings fresh perspectives to the review process.
Use Pull Requests
Use pull requests (PRs) for code reviews. PRs provide a structured way to review changes, comment on specific lines, and discuss issues. They also integrate well with version control systems like GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket.
Example: Using GitHub Pull Requests
When creating a GitHub pull request, include a clear description of the changes:
```markdown
- Description
- Added functionality to fetch user data from the database.
- Refactored the `get_user_data` function to use parameterized queries.
```
Reviewers can then comment on specific lines, suggest changes, and approve or request further modifications.
Set a Review Turnaround Time
Establish a standard turnaround time for code reviews. Prompt reviews help maintain development momentum and prevent bottlenecks. Aim for reviews to be completed within a day or two, and set expectations accordingly.
Balance Criticism with Praise
Balance criticism with praise during code reviews. Acknowledge well-written code and improvements, in addition to pointing out issues. This positive reinforcement encourages developers and fosters a supportive review culture.
Keep Reviews Focused
Keep code reviews focused on the code being changed. Avoid tangential discussions and stay on topic. If broader issues are identified, address them separately in a different review or meeting to keep the current review manageable.
Enforce Coding Standards
Enforce coding standards consistently during code reviews. Ensure that the code adheres to the team's style guide and conventions. This helps maintain a uniform codebase and reduces the cognitive load on developers.
Example: Enforcing Code Style
Use tools like ESLint for JavaScript to enforce code style automatically:
```javascript // Sample .eslintrc.json configuration {
"extends": "eslint:recommended",
"rules": {
"indent": ["error", 2],
"quotes": ["error", "single"],
"semi": ["error", "always"]
}
}
```
Review Test Coverage
Check that the code being reviewed includes adequate test coverage. Ensure that unit tests, integration tests, and end-to-end tests are in place and cover the critical paths. This helps catch potential issues and ensures the code behaves as expected.
Consider Long-Term Maintenance
Think about the long-term maintenance of the code during reviews. Ensure that the code is not only functional now but will also be maintainable in the future. Consider the impact of changes on the overall system and potential areas of future improvement.
Review Documentation
Verify that the code includes appropriate documentation. This includes inline comments, method and function docstrings, and external documentation where necessary. Clear documentation helps future developers understand and maintain the code.
Example: Documenting a Python Function
Here's an example of adding a docstring to a Python function:
```python def add_numbers(a, b):
""" Adds two numbers and returns the result.
Parameters: a (int or float): The first number. b (int or float): The second number.
Returns: int or float: The sum of the two numbers. """ return a + b```
Encourage Continuous Learning
Encourage continuous learning and improvement through code reviews. Share resources, articles, and best practices with the team. Use reviews as an opportunity to educate and elevate the team's collective skill level.
Handle Disagreements Professionally
Handle disagreements during code reviews professionally. If conflicts arise, address them constructively and seek to understand different perspectives. Focus on finding the best solution for the codebase and the team rather than winning an argument.
Conclusion
Following these best practices for code reviews can significantly enhance code quality, security, and team collaboration. By establishing clear guidelines, using automation tools, providing constructive feedback, and fostering open communication, teams can make their code review process more effective and enjoyable.
For more information, visit https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Code_review and https://smartbear.com/learn/code-review/.
Fair Use Sources
- Code review for Archive Access for Fair Use Preservation, quoting, paraphrasing, excerpting and/or commenting upon
Best Practices: ChatGPT Best Practices, DevOps Best Practices, IaC Best Practices, GitOps Best Practices, Cloud Native Best Practices, Programming Best Practices (1. Python Best Practices | Python - Django Best Practices | Django - Flask Best Practices | Flask - - Pandas Best Practices | Pandas, 2. JavaScript Best Practices | JavaScript - HTML Best Practices | HTML - CSS Best Practices | CSS - React Best Practices | React - Next.js Best Practices | Next.js - Node.js Best Practices | Node.js - NPM Best Practices | NPM - Express.js Best Practices | Express.js - Deno Best Practices | Deno - Babel Best Practices | Babel - Vue.js Best Practices | Vue.js, 3. Java Best Practices | Java - JVM Best Practices | JVM - Spring Boot Best Practices | Spring Boot - Quarkus Best Practices | Quarkus, 4. C Sharp Best Practices | C - dot NET Best Practices | dot NET, 5. CPP Best Practices | C++, 6. PHP Best Practices | PHP - Laravel Best Practices | Laravel, 7. TypeScript Best Practices | TypeScript - Angular Best Practices | Angular, 8. Ruby Best Practices | Ruby - Ruby on Rails Best Practices | Ruby on Rails, 9. C Best Practices | C, 10. Swift Best Practices | Swift, 11. R Best Practices | R, 12. Objective-C Best Practices | Objective-C, 13. Scala Best Practices | Scala - Z Best Practices | Z, 14. Golang Best Practices | Go - Gin Best Practices | Gin, 15. Kotlin Best Practices | Kotlin - Ktor Best Practices | Ktor, 16. Rust Best Practices | Rust - Rocket Framework Best Practices | Rocket Framework, 17. Dart Best Practices | Dart - Flutter Best Practices | Flutter, 18. Lua Best Practices | Lua, 19. Perl Best Practices | Perl, 20. Haskell Best Practices | Haskell, 21. Julia Best Practices | Julia, 22. Clojure Best Practices | Clojure, 23. Elixir Best Practices | Elixir - Phoenix Framework Best Practices | Phoenix Framework, 24. F Sharp | Best Practices | F, 25. Assembly Best Practices | Assembly, 26. bash Best Practices | bash, 27. SQL Best Practices | SQL, 28. Groovy Best Practices | Groovy, 29. PowerShell Best Practices | PowerShell, 30. MATLAB Best Practices | MATLAB, 31. VBA Best Practices | VBA, 32. Racket Best Practices | Racket, 33. Scheme Best Practices | Scheme, 34. Prolog Best Practices | Prolog, 35. Erlang Best Practices | Erlang, 36. Ada Best Practices | Ada, 37. Fortran Best Practices | Fortran, 38. COBOL Best Practices | COBOL, 39. VB.NET Best Practices | VB.NET, 40. Lisp Best Practices | Lisp, 41. SAS Best Practices | SAS, 42. D Best Practices | D, 43. LabVIEW Best Practices | LabVIEW, 44. PL/SQL Best Practices | PL/SQL, 45. Delphi/Object Pascal Best Practices | Delphi/Object Pascal, 46. ColdFusion Best Practices | ColdFusion, 47. CLIST Best Practices | CLIST, 48. REXX Best Practices | REXX. Old Programming Languages: APL Best Practices | APL, Pascal Best Practices | Pascal, Algol Best Practices | Algol, PL/I Best Practices | PL/I); Programming Style Guides, Clean Code, Pragmatic Programmer, Git Best Practices, Continuous Integration CI Best Practices, Continuous Delivery CD Best Practices, Continuous Deployment Best Practices, Code Health Best Practices, Refactoring Best Practices, Database Best Practices, Dependency Management Best Practices (The most important task of a programmer is dependency management! - see latest Manning book MEAP, also Dependency Injection Principles, Practices, and Patterns), Continuous Testing and TDD Best Practices, Pentesting Best Practices, Team Best Practices, Agile Best Practices, Meetings Best Practices, Communications Best Practices, Work Space Best Practices, Remote Work Best Practices, Networking Best Practices, Life Best Practices, Agile Manifesto, Zen of Python, Clean Code, Pragmatic Programmer. (navbar_best_practices - see also navbar_anti-patterns)
Cloud Monk is Retired ( for now). Buddha with you. © 2025 and Beginningless Time - Present Moment - Three Times: The Buddhas or Fair Use. Disclaimers
SYI LU SENG E MU CHYWE YE. NAN. WEI LA YE. WEI LA YE. SA WA HE.
Code review Anti-Patterns
See: Code review Anti-Patterns
Return to Code review, Anti-Patterns, Code review Best Practices, Code review Security, Code review and the OWASP Top 10
Introduction
Code review anti-patterns are practices and behaviors that negatively impact the effectiveness of the code review process. Recognizing and avoiding these anti-patterns is crucial for maintaining a healthy and productive development environment. This guide highlights 20 common code review anti-patterns and provides recommendations to address them.
Nitpicking
Nitpicking involves focusing excessively on minor issues such as formatting, indentation, or small stylistic preferences, rather than addressing more significant problems. This behavior can be demotivating for authors and can detract from the primary goals of code reviews. Use automated tools to handle minor issues and focus on substantial improvements during reviews.
Bike-Shedding
Bike-shedding occurs when reviewers spend excessive time debating trivial issues while neglecting more critical aspects of the code. This can lead to unproductive discussions and delays in the review process. To avoid bike-shedding, prioritize reviewing functionality, logic, and security over minor details.
Ego-Driven Reviews
Ego-driven reviews happen when reviewers impose their own preferences and styles on the code, rather than adhering to team standards. This can create tension and reduce collaboration within the team. Reviewers should focus on aligning with agreed-upon coding standards and providing objective feedback.
Inconsistent Standards
Applying inconsistent standards during code reviews can lead to confusion and frustration among developers. Ensure that the team has a clear and documented coding standard that everyone follows. Consistency in reviews helps maintain a uniform codebase and reduces misunderstandings.
Lack of Context
Reviewing code without understanding the broader context can result in misleading feedback. Reviewers should take the time to understand the purpose and scope of the changes before providing feedback. This helps ensure that comments are relevant and useful.
Overloading Reviews
Overloading reviews with too many changes at once can overwhelm reviewers and reduce the quality of feedback. Break down large changes into smaller, manageable parts that can be reviewed more thoroughly. This makes the review process more efficient and effective.
Late Reviews
Delaying reviews can slow down the development process and lead to merge conflicts. Establishing a standard turnaround time for reviews helps maintain momentum and ensures that feedback is timely. Aim to complete reviews within a day or two.
Ignoring Tests
Neglecting to review tests is a common anti-pattern. Tests are crucial for ensuring the reliability of the code. Reviewers should verify that tests are present, well-written, and cover the necessary scenarios. This helps maintain high test coverage and prevents regressions.
Superficial Reviews
Superficial reviews occur when reviewers provide only cursory feedback without thoroughly examining the code. This can result in missed issues and reduced code quality. Reviewers should take the time to understand the code and provide detailed, thoughtful feedback.
Negative Tone
Using a negative or confrontational tone in reviews can create a hostile environment and discourage collaboration. Feedback should be constructive and respectful, focusing on the code rather than the individual. Positive reinforcement and polite suggestions foster a better review culture.
Example: Negative Feedback
Negative feedback: ```markdown This code is terrible. You need to rewrite this completely. ```
Constructive feedback: ```markdown I noticed some issues with the approach here. Could we refactor this to improve readability and maintainability? ```
Personal Attacks
Making personal attacks or attributing mistakes to individual incompetence is harmful and unprofessional. Reviews should focus on improving the code and helping team members grow. Avoid comments that target the author personally.
Lack of Preparation
Reviewers who do not prepare adequately before starting a review may provide incomplete or inaccurate feedback. Taking the time to understand the context and purpose of the changes leads to more effective reviews. Reviewers should read the description and related documentation before diving into the code.
Ignoring Feedback
Authors who ignore feedback or dismiss comments without consideration can hinder the review process. Engaging with reviewers and discussing feedback constructively helps improve the code and fosters a collaborative environment. Address feedback thoughtfully and explain any disagreements respectfully.
Example: Ignoring Feedback
Ignoring feedback: ```markdown Author: I'm not going to change this. It's fine as it is. ```
Engaging with feedback: ```markdown Author: I understand your concern. However, I believe this approach works because [reason]. Let's discuss it further. ```
Overly Lengthy Reviews
Reviews that are overly lengthy and detailed can overwhelm authors and delay the review process. Keep feedback concise and focused on the most critical issues. If more extensive discussion is needed, consider scheduling a meeting to address complex topics.
Lack of Follow-Up
Failing to follow up on feedback or check that changes have been made can undermine the review process. Reviewers should ensure that their comments are addressed and that the code has been updated accordingly. This helps maintain accountability and ensures issues are resolved.
Reviewing in Isolation
Reviewing code in isolation, without considering how it fits into the larger system, can lead to missed issues and integration problems. Reviewers should understand the broader context and how changes impact other parts of the system. This holistic approach ensures that the code integrates well and functions correctly.
Overly Critical Reviews
Being overly critical and focusing only on negative aspects can demoralize authors. Balance criticism with positive feedback, acknowledging well-written code and improvements. This approach encourages developers and fosters a supportive review culture.
Failing to Encourage Best Practices
Reviews should not only catch errors but also encourage best practices and continuous improvement. Highlight areas where best practices are followed and suggest improvements where needed. This helps the team grow and maintain high coding standards.
Conclusion
Avoiding these common anti-patterns can significantly improve the effectiveness of code reviews. By focusing on constructive feedback, maintaining consistency, and fostering a collaborative environment, teams can enhance code quality, security, and overall productivity.
For more information, visit https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Code_review and https://smartbear.com/learn/code-review/.
Fair Use Sources
- Code review for Archive Access for Fair Use Preservation, quoting, paraphrasing, excerpting and/or commenting upon
Anti-Patterns: ChatGPT Anti-Patterns, DevOps Anti-Patterns, IaC Anti-Patterns, GitOps Anti-Patterns, Cloud Native Anti-Patterns, Programming Anti-Patterns (1. Python Anti-Patterns | Python - Django Anti-Patterns | Django - Flask Anti-Patterns | Flask - - Pandas Anti-Patterns | Pandas, 2. JavaScript Anti-Patterns | JavaScript - HTML Anti-Patterns | HTML - CSS Anti-Patterns | CSS - React Anti-Patterns | React - Next.js Anti-Patterns | Next.js - Node.js Anti-Patterns | Node.js - NPM Anti-Patterns | NPM - Express.js Anti-Patterns | Express.js - Deno Anti-Patterns | Deno - Babel Anti-Patterns | Babel - Vue.js Anti-Patterns | Vue.js, 3. Java Anti-Patterns | Java - JVM Anti-Patterns | JVM - Spring Boot Anti-Patterns | Spring Boot - Quarkus Anti-Patterns | Quarkus, 4. C Sharp Anti-Patterns | C - dot NET Anti-Patterns | dot NET, 5. CPP Anti-Patterns | C++, 6. PHP Anti-Patterns | PHP - Laravel Anti-Patterns | Laravel, 7. TypeScript Anti-Patterns | TypeScript - Angular Anti-Patterns | Angular, 8. Ruby Anti-Patterns | Ruby - Ruby on Rails Anti-Patterns | Ruby on Rails, 9. C Anti-Patterns | C, 10. Swift Anti-Patterns | Swift, 11. R Anti-Patterns | R, 12. Objective-C Anti-Patterns | Objective-C, 13. Scala Anti-Patterns | Scala - Z Anti-Patterns | Z, 14. Golang Anti-Patterns | Go - Gin Anti-Patterns | Gin, 15. Kotlin Anti-Patterns | Kotlin - Ktor Anti-Patterns | Ktor, 16. Rust Anti-Patterns | Rust - Rocket Framework Anti-Patterns | Rocket Framework, 17. Dart Anti-Patterns | Dart - Flutter Anti-Patterns | Flutter, 18. Lua Anti-Patterns | Lua, 19. Perl Anti-Patterns | Perl, 20. Haskell Anti-Patterns | Haskell, 21. Julia Anti-Patterns | Julia, 22. Clojure Anti-Patterns | Clojure, 23. Elixir Anti-Patterns | Elixir - Phoenix Framework Anti-Patterns | Phoenix Framework, 24. F Sharp | Anti-Patterns | F, 25. Assembly Anti-Patterns | Assembly, 26. bash Anti-Patterns | bash, 27. SQL Anti-Patterns | SQL, 28. Groovy Anti-Patterns | Groovy, 29. PowerShell Anti-Patterns | PowerShell, 30. MATLAB Anti-Patterns | MATLAB, 31. VBA Anti-Patterns | VBA, 32. Racket Anti-Patterns | Racket, 33. Scheme Anti-Patterns | Scheme, 34. Prolog Anti-Patterns | Prolog, 35. Erlang Anti-Patterns | Erlang, 36. Ada Anti-Patterns | Ada, 37. Fortran Anti-Patterns | Fortran, 38. COBOL Anti-Patterns | COBOL, 39. VB.NET Anti-Patterns | VB.NET, 40. Lisp Anti-Patterns | Lisp, 41. SAS Anti-Patterns | SAS, 42. D Anti-Patterns | D, 43. LabVIEW Anti-Patterns | LabVIEW, 44. PL/SQL Anti-Patterns | PL/SQL, 45. Delphi/Object Pascal Anti-Patterns | Delphi/Object Pascal, 46. ColdFusion Anti-Patterns | ColdFusion, 47. CLIST Anti-Patterns | CLIST, 48. REXX Anti-Patterns | REXX. Old Programming Languages: APL Anti-Patterns | APL, Pascal Anti-Patterns | Pascal, Algol Anti-Patterns | Algol, PL/I Anti-Patterns | PL/I); Programming Style Guides, Clean Code, Pragmatic Programmer, Git Anti-Patterns, Continuous Integration CI Anti-Patterns, Continuous Delivery CD Anti-Patterns, Continuous Deployment Anti-Patterns, Code Health Anti-Patterns, Refactoring Anti-Patterns, Database Anti-Patterns, Dependency Management Anti-Patterns (The most important task of a programmer is dependency management! - see latest Manning book MEAP, also Dependency Injection Principles, Practices, and Patterns), Continuous Testing and TDD Anti-Patterns, Pentesting Anti-Patterns, Team Anti-Patterns, Agile Anti-Patterns, Meetings Anti-Patterns, Communications Anti-Patterns, Work Space Anti-Patterns, Remote Work Anti-Patterns, Networking Anti-Patterns, Life Anti-Patterns, Agile Manifesto, Zen of Python, Clean Code, Pragmatic Programmer. (navbar_anti-patterns - see also navbar_best_practices)
Code review Security
See: Code review Security
Return to Code review, Security, Code review Authorization with OAuth, Code review and JWT Tokens, Code review and the OWASP Top 10
Summarize this topic in 20 paragraphs. Give code examples. Make the Wikipedia or other references URLs as raw URLs. Put a section heading for each paragraph. Section headings must start and end with 2 equals signs. Do not put double square brackets around words in section headings. You MUST ALWAYS put double square brackets around EVERY acronym, product name, company or corporation name, name of a person, country, state, place, years, dates, buzzword, slang, jargon or technical words. REMEMBER, you MUST MUST ALWAYS put double square brackets around EVERY acronym!
Fair Use Sources
- Code review for Archive Access for Fair Use Preservation, quoting, paraphrasing, excerpting and/or commenting upon
Access Control, Access Control List, Access Management, Account Lockout, Account Takeover, Active Defense, Active Directory Security, Active Scanning, Advanced Encryption Standard, Advanced Persistent Threat, Adversarial Machine Learning, Adware, Air Gap, Algorithmic Security, Anomaly Detection, Anti-Malware, Antivirus Software, Anti-Spyware, Application Blacklisting, Application Layer Security, Application Security, Application Whitelisting, Arbitrary Code Execution, Artificial Intelligence Security, Asset Discovery, Asset Management, Asymmetric Encryption, Asymmetric Key Cryptography, Attack Chain, Attack Simulation, Attack Surface, Attack Vector, Attribute-Based Access Control, Audit Logging, Audit Trail, Authentication, Authentication Protocol, Authentication Token, Authorization, Automated Threat Detection, AutoRun Malware, Backdoor, Backup and Recovery, Baseline Configuration, Behavioral Analysis, Behavioral Biometrics, Behavioral Monitoring, Biometric Authentication, Black Hat Hacker, Black Hat Hacking, Blacklisting, Blockchain Security, Blue Team, Boot Sector Virus, Botnet, Botnet Detection, Boundary Protection, Brute Force Attack, Brute Force Protection, Buffer Overflow, Buffer Overflow Attack, Bug Bounty Program, Business Continuity Plan, Business Email Compromise, BYOD Security, Cache Poisoning, CAPTCHA Security, Certificate Authority, Certificate Pinning, Chain of Custody, Challenge-Response Authentication, Challenge-Handshake Authentication Protocol, Chief Information Security Officer, Cipher Block Chaining, Cipher Suite, Ciphertext, Circuit-Level Gateway, Clickjacking, Cloud Access Security Broker, Cloud Encryption, Cloud Security, Cloud Security Alliance, Cloud Security Posture Management, Code Injection, Code Review, Code Signing, Cold Boot Attack, Command Injection, Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures, Common Vulnerability Scoring System, Compromised Account, Computer Emergency Response Team, Computer Forensics, Computer Security Incident Response Team, Confidentiality, Confidentiality Agreement, Configuration Baseline, Configuration Management, Content Filtering, Continuous Monitoring, Cross-Site Request Forgery, Cross-Site Request Forgery Protection, Cross-Site Scripting, Cross-Site Scripting Protection, Cross-Platform Malware, Cryptanalysis, Cryptanalysis Attack, Cryptographic Algorithm, Cryptographic Hash Function, Cryptographic Key, Cryptography, Cryptojacking, Cyber Attack, Cyber Deception, Cyber Defense, Cyber Espionage, Cyber Hygiene, Cyber Insurance, Cyber Kill Chain, Cyber Resilience, Cyber Terrorism, Cyber Threat, Cyber Threat Intelligence, Cyber Threat Intelligence Sharing, Cyber Warfare, Cybersecurity, Cybersecurity Awareness, Cybersecurity Awareness Training, Cybersecurity Compliance, Cybersecurity Framework, Cybersecurity Incident, Cybersecurity Incident Response, Cybersecurity Insurance, Cybersecurity Maturity Model, Cybersecurity Policy, Cybersecurity Risk, Cybersecurity Risk Assessment, Cybersecurity Strategy, Dark Web Monitoring, Data at Rest Encryption, Data Breach, Data Breach Notification, Data Classification, Data Encryption, Data Encryption Standard, Data Exfiltration, Data Governance, Data Integrity, Data Leakage Prevention, Data Loss Prevention, Data Masking, Data Mining Attacks, Data Privacy, Data Protection, Data Retention Policy, Data Sanitization, Data Security, Data Wiping, Deauthentication Attack, Decryption, Decryption Key, Deep Packet Inspection, Defense in Depth, Defense-in-Depth Strategy, Deidentification, Demilitarized Zone, Denial of Service Attack, Denial-of-Service Attack, Device Fingerprinting, Dictionary Attack, Digital Certificate, Digital Certificate Management, Digital Forensics, Digital Forensics and Incident Response, Digital Rights Management, Digital Signature, Disaster Recovery, Disaster Recovery Plan, Distributed Denial of Service Attack, Distributed Denial-of-Service Attack, Distributed Denial-of-Service Mitigation, DNS Amplification Attack, DNS Poisoning, DNS Security Extensions, DNS Spoofing, Domain Hijacking, Domain Name System Security, Drive Encryption, Drive-by Download, Dumpster Diving, Dynamic Analysis, Dynamic Code Analysis, Dynamic Data Exchange Exploits, Eavesdropping, Eavesdropping Attack, Edge Security, Email Encryption, Email Security, Email Spoofing, Embedded Systems Security, Employee Awareness Training, Encapsulation Security Payload, Encryption, Encryption Algorithm, Encryption Key, Endpoint Detection and Response, Endpoint Protection Platform, Endpoint Security, Enterprise Mobility Management, Ethical Hacking, Ethical Hacking Techniques, Event Correlation, Event Logging, Exploit, Exploit Development, Exploit Framework, Exploit Kit, Exploit Prevention, Exposure, Extended Detection and Response, Extended Validation Certificate, External Threats, False Negative, False Positive, File Integrity Monitoring, File Transfer Protocol Security, Fileless Malware, Firmware Analysis, Firmware Security, Firewall, Firewall Rules, Forensic Analysis, Forensic Investigation, Formal Methods in Security, Formal Verification, Fraud Detection, Full Disk Encryption, Fuzz Testing, Fuzz Testing Techniques, Gateway Security, General Data Protection Regulation, General Data Protection Regulation Compliance, Governance Risk Compliance, Governance, Risk, and Compliance, Gray Hat Hacker, Gray Hat Hacking, Group Policy, Group Policy Management, Hacker, Hacking, Hardware Security Module, Hash Collision Attack, Hash Function, Hashing, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act Compliance, Heartbleed Vulnerability, Heuristic Analysis, Heuristic Detection, High-Availability Clustering, Honeynet, Honeypot, Honeypot Detection, Host-Based Intrusion Detection System, Host Intrusion Prevention System, Host-Based Intrusion Prevention System, Hypervisor Security, Identity and Access Management, Identity Theft, Incident Handling, Incident Response, Incident Response Plan, Incident Response Team, Industrial Control Systems Security, Information Assurance, Information Security, Information Security Management System, Information Security Policy, Information Systems Security Engineering, Insider Threat, Integrity, Intellectual Property Theft, Interactive Application Security Testing, Internet of Things Security, Intrusion Detection System, Intrusion Prevention System, IP Spoofing, ISO 27001, IT Security Governance, Jailbreaking, JavaScript Injection, Juice Jacking, Key Escrow, Key Exchange, Key Management, Keylogger, Kill Chain, Knowledge-Based Authentication, Lateral Movement, Layered Security, Least Privilege, Lightweight Directory Access Protocol, Log Analysis, Log Management, Logic Bomb, Macro Virus, Malicious Code, Malicious Insider, Malicious Software, Malvertising, Malware, Malware Analysis, Man-in-the-Middle Attack, Mandatory Access Control, Mandatory Vacation Policy, Mass Assignment Vulnerability, Media Access Control Filtering, Message Authentication Code, Mobile Device Management, Multi-Factor Authentication, Multifunction Device Security, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Network Access Control, Network Security, Network Security Monitoring, Network Segmentation, Network Tap, Non-Repudiation, Obfuscation Techniques, Offensive Security, Open Authorization, Open Web Application Security Project, Operating System Hardening, Operational Technology Security, Packet Filtering, Packet Sniffing, Pass the Hash Attack, Password Cracking, Password Policy, Patch Management, Penetration Testing, Penetration Testing Execution Standard, Perfect Forward Secrecy, Peripheral Device Security, Pharming, Phishing, Physical Security, Piggybacking, Plaintext, Point-to-Point Encryption, Policy Enforcement, Polymorphic Malware, Port Knocking, Port Scanning, Post-Exploitation, Pretexting, Preventive Controls, Privacy Impact Assessment, Privacy Policy, Privilege Escalation, Privilege Management, Privileged Access Management, Procedure Masking, Proactive Threat Hunting, Protected Health Information, Protected Information, Protection Profile, Proxy Server, Public Key Cryptography, Public Key Infrastructure, Purple Teaming, Quantum Cryptography, Quantum Key Distribution, Ransomware, Ransomware Attack, Red Teaming, Redundant Array of Independent Disks, Remote Access, Remote Access Trojan, Remote Code Execution, Replay Attack, Reverse Engineering, Risk Analysis, Risk Assessment, Risk Management, Risk Mitigation, Role-Based Access Control, Root of Trust, Rootkit, Salami Attack, Sandbox, Sandboxing, Secure Coding, Secure File Transfer Protocol, Secure Hash Algorithm, Secure Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions, Secure Shell Protocol, Secure Socket Layer, Secure Sockets Layer, Secure Software Development Life Cycle, Security Assertion Markup Language, Security Audit, Security Awareness Training, Security Breach, Security Controls, Security Event Management, Security Governance, Security Incident, Security Incident Response, Security Information and Event Management, Security Monitoring, Security Operations Center, Security Orchestration, Security Policy, Security Posture, Security Token, Security Vulnerability, Segmentation, Session Fixation, Session Hijacking, Shoulder Surfing, Signature-Based Detection, Single Sign-On, Skimming, Smishing, Sniffing, Social Engineering, Social Engineering Attack, Software Bill of Materials, Software Composition Analysis, Software Exploit, Software Security, Spear Phishing, Spoofing, Spyware, SQL Injection, Steganography, Supply Chain Attack, Supply Chain Security, Symmetric Encryption, Symmetric Key Cryptography, System Hardening, System Integrity, Tabletop Exercise, Tailgating, Threat Actor, Threat Assessment, Threat Hunting, Threat Intelligence, Threat Modeling, Ticket Granting Ticket, Time-Based One-Time Password, Tokenization, Traffic Analysis, Transport Layer Security, Transport Security Layer, Trapdoor, Trojan Horse, Two-Factor Authentication, Two-Person Control, Typosquatting, Unauthorized Access, Unified Threat Management, User Behavior Analytics, User Rights Management, Virtual Private Network, Virus, Vishing, Vulnerability, Vulnerability Assessment, Vulnerability Disclosure, Vulnerability Management, Vulnerability Scanning, Watering Hole Attack, Whaling, White Hat Hacker, White Hat Hacking, Whitelisting, Wi-Fi Protected Access, Wi-Fi Security, Wi-Fi Protected Setup, Worm, Zero-Day Exploit, Zero Trust Security, Zombie Computer
Cybersecurity: DevSecOps - Security Automation, Cloud Security - Cloud Native Security (AWS Security - Azure Security - GCP Security - IBM Cloud Security - Oracle Cloud Security, Container Security, Docker Security, Podman Security, Kubernetes Security, Google Anthos Security, Red Hat OpenShift Security); CIA Triad (Confidentiality - Integrity - Availability, Authorization - OAuth, Identity and Access Management (IAM), JVM Security (Java Security, Spring Security, Micronaut Security, Quarkus Security, Helidon Security, MicroProfile Security, Dropwizard Security, Vert.x Security, Play Framework Security, Akka Security, Ratpack Security, Netty Security, Spark Framework Security, Kotlin Security - Ktor Security, Scala Security, Clojure Security, Groovy Security;
, JavaScript Security, HTML Security, HTTP Security - HTTPS Security - SSL Security - TLS Security, CSS Security - Bootstrap Security - Tailwind Security, Web Storage API Security (localStorage Security, sessionStorage Security), Cookie Security, IndexedDB Security, TypeScript Security, Node.js Security, NPM Security, Deno Security, Express.js Security, React Security, Angular Security, Vue.js Security, Next.js Security, Remix.js Security, PWA Security, SPA Security, Svelts.js Security, Ionic Security, Web Components Security, Nuxt.js Security, Z Security, htmx Security
Python Security - Django Security - Flask Security - Pandas Security,
Database Security (Database Security on Kubernetes, Database Security on Containers / Database Security on Docker, Cloud Database Security - DBaaS Security, Concurrent Programming and Database Security, Functional Concurrent Programming and Database Security, Async Programming and Databases Security, MySQL Security, Oracle Database Security, Microsoft SQL Server Security, MongoDB Security, PostgreSQL Security, SQLite Security, Amazon RDS Security, IBM Db2 Security, MariaDB Security, Redis Security (Valkey Security), Cassandra Security, Amazon Aurora Security, Microsoft Azure SQL Database Security, Neo4j Security, Google Cloud SQL Security, Firebase Realtime Database Security, Apache HBase Security, Amazon DynamoDB Security, Couchbase Server Security, Elasticsearch Security, Teradata Database Security, Memcached Security, Infinispan Security, Amazon Redshift Security, SQLite Security, CouchDB Security, Apache Kafka Security, IBM Informix Security, SAP HANA Security, RethinkDB Security, InfluxDB Security, MarkLogic Security, ArangoDB Security, RavenDB Security, VoltDB Security, Apache Derby Security, Cosmos DB Security, Hive Security, Apache Flink Security, Google Bigtable Security, Hadoop Security, HP Vertica Security, Alibaba Cloud Table Store Security, InterSystems Caché Security, Greenplum Security, Apache Ignite Security, FoundationDB Security, Amazon Neptune Security, FaunaDB Security, QuestDB Security, Presto Security, TiDB Security, NuoDB Security, ScyllaDB Security, Percona Server for MySQL Security, Apache Phoenix Security, EventStoreDB Security, SingleStore Security, Aerospike Security, MonetDB Security, Google Cloud Spanner Security, SQream Security, GridDB Security, MaxDB Security, RocksDB Security, TiKV Security, Oracle NoSQL Database Security, Google Firestore Security, Druid Security, SAP IQ Security, Yellowbrick Data Security, InterSystems IRIS Security, InterBase Security, Kudu Security, eXtremeDB Security, OmniSci Security, Altibase Security, Google Cloud Bigtable Security, Amazon QLDB Security, Hypertable Security, ApsaraDB for Redis Security, Pivotal Greenplum Security, MapR Database Security, Informatica Security, Microsoft Access Security, Tarantool Security, Blazegraph Security, NeoDatis Security, FileMaker Security, ArangoDB Security, RavenDB Security, AllegroGraph Security, Alibaba Cloud ApsaraDB for PolarDB Security, DuckDB Security, Starcounter Security, EventStore Security, ObjectDB Security, Alibaba Cloud AnalyticDB for PostgreSQL Security, Akumuli Security, Google Cloud Datastore Security, Skytable Security, NCache Security, FaunaDB Security, OpenEdge Security, Amazon DocumentDB Security, HyperGraphDB Security, Citus Data Security, Objectivity/DB). Database drivers (JDBC Security, ODBC), ORM (Hibernate Security, Microsoft Entity Framework), SQL Operators and Functions Security, Database IDEs (JetBrains DataSpell Security, SQL Server Management Studio Security, MySQL Workbench Security, Oracle SQL Developer Security, SQLiteStudio),
Programming Language Security ((1. Python Security, 2. JavaScript Security, 3. Java Security, 4. C Sharp Security | Security, 5. CPP Security | C++ Security, 6. PHP Security, 7. TypeScript Security, 8. Ruby Security, 9. C Security, 10. Swift Security, 11. R Security, 12. Objective-C Security, 13. Scala Security, 14. Golang Security, 15. Kotlin Security, 16. Rust Security, 17. Dart Security, 18. Lua Security, 19. Perl Security, 20. Haskell Security, 21. Julia Security, 22. Clojure Security, 23. Elixir Security, 24. F Sharp Security | Security, 25. Assembly Language Security, 26. Shell Script Security / bash Security, 27. SQL Security, 28. Groovy Security, 29. PowerShell Security, 30. MATLAB Security, 31. VBA Security, 32. Racket Security, 33. Scheme Security, 34. Prolog Security, 35. Erlang Security, 36. Ada Security, 37. Fortran Security, 38. COBOL Security, 39. Lua Security, 40. VB.NET Security, 41. Lisp Security, 42. SAS Security, 43. D Security, 44. LabVIEW Security, 45. PL/SQL Security, 46. Delphi/Object Pascal Security, 47. ColdFusion Security, 49. CLIST Security, 50. REXX);
OS Security, Mobile Security: Android Security - Kotlin Security - Java Security, iOS Security - Swift Security; Windows Security - Windows Server Security, Linux Security (Ubuntu Security, Debian Security, RHEL Security, Fedora Security), UNIX Security (FreeBSD Security), IBM z Mainframe Security (RACF Security), Passwords (Windows Passwords, Linux Passwords, FreeBSD Passwords, Android Passwords, iOS Passwords, macOS Passwords, IBM z/OS Passwords), Password alternatives (Passwordless, Personal Access Token (PAT), GitHub Personal Access Token (PAT), Passkeys), Hacking (Ethical Hacking, White Hat, Black Hat, Grey Hat), Pentesting (Red Team - Blue Team - Purple Team), Cybersecurity Certifications (CEH, GIAC, CISM, CompTIA Security Plus, CISSP), Mitre Framework, Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE), Cybersecurity Bibliography, Cybersecurity Courses, Firewalls, CI/CD Security (GitHub Actions Security, Azure DevOps Security, Jenkins Security, Circle CI Security), Functional Programming and Cybersecurity, Cybersecurity and Concurrency, Cybersecurity and Data Science - Cybersecurity and Databases, Cybersecurity and Machine Learning, Cybersecurity Glossary (RFC 4949 Internet Security Glossary), Awesome Cybersecurity, Cybersecurity GitHub, Cybersecurity Topics (navbar_security - see also navbar_aws_security, navbar_azure_security, navbar_gcp_security, navbar_k8s_security, navbar_docker_security, navbar_podman_security, navbar_mainframe_security, navbar_ibm_cloud_security, navbar_oracle_cloud_security, navbar_database_security, navbar_windows_security, navbar_linux_security, navbar_macos_security, navbar_android_security, navbar_ios_security, navbar_os_security, navbar_firewalls, navbar_encryption, navbar_passwords, navbar_iam, navbar_pentesting, navbar_privacy, navbar_rfc)
Code review Authorization with OAuth
See: Code review Authorization with OAuth
Return to Code review, OAuth, Code review Security, Security, Code review and JWT Tokens, Code review and the OWASP Top 10
Summarize this topic in 12 paragraphs. Give code examples. Make the Wikipedia or other references URLs as raw URLs. Put a section heading for each paragraph. Section headings must start and end with 2 equals signs. Do not put double square brackets around words in section headings. You MUST ALWAYS put double square brackets around EVERY acronym, product name, company or corporation name, name of a person, country, state, place, years, dates, buzzword, slang, jargon or technical words. REMEMBER, you MUST MUST ALWAYS put double square brackets around EVERY acronym!
Fair Use Sources
- Code review for Archive Access for Fair Use Preservation, quoting, paraphrasing, excerpting and/or commenting upon
OAuth: OAuth Glossary, Verified ID
OAuth RFCs: RFC 6749 The OAuth 2.0 Authorization Framework, Bearer Token Usage, RFC 7519 JSON Web Token (JWT), RFC 7521 Assertion Framework for OAuth 2.0 Client Authentication and Authorization Grants, RFC 7522 Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) 2.0 Profile for OAuth 2.0 Client Authentication and Authorization Grants, RFC 7523 JSON Web Token (JWT) Profile for OAuth 2.0 Client Authentication and Authorization Grants, RFC 7636 Proof Key for Code Exchange by OAuth Public Clients, RFC 7662 OAuth 2.0 Token Introspection, RFC 8252 OAuth 2.0 for Native Apps, RFC 8414 OAuth 2.0 Authorization Server Metadata, RFC 8628 OAuth 2.0 Device Authorization Grant, RFC 8705 OAuth 2.0 Mutual-TLS Client Authentication and Certificate-Bound Access Tokens, RFC 8725 JSON Web Token (JWT) Profile for OAuth 2.0 Access Tokens, RFC 7009 OAuth 2.0 Token Revocation, RFC 7591 OAuth 2.0 Dynamic Client Registration Protocol, RFC 7592 OAuth 2.0 Dynamic Client Management Protocol, RFC 6819 OAuth 2.0 Threat Model and Security Considerations, RFC 7524 Interoperable Security for Web Substrate (WebSub), RFC 7033 WebFinger, RFC 8251 Updates to the OAuth 2.0 Security Threat Model.
OAuth Topics: Most Common Topics: OAuth 2.0, OAuth 1.0, Access Tokens, Refresh Tokens, Authorization Code Grant, Client Credentials Grant, Implicit Grant, Resource Owner Password Credentials Grant, Token Expiry, Token Revocation, Scopes, Client Registration, Authorization Servers, Resource Servers, Redirection URIs, Secure Token Storage, Token Introspection, JSON Web Tokens (JWT), OpenID Connect, PKCE (Proof Key for Code Exchange), Token Endpoint, Authorization Endpoint, Response Types, Grant Types, Token Lifespan, OAuth Flows, Consent Screen, Third-Party Applications, OAuth Clients, Client Secrets, State Parameter, Code Challenge, Code Verifier, Access Token Request, Access Token Response, OAuth Libraries, OAuth Debugging, OAuth in Mobile Apps, OAuth in Single Page Applications, OAuth in Web Applications, OAuth in Microservices, OAuth for APIs, OAuth Providers, User Authentication, User Authorization, OAuth Scenarios, OAuth Vulnerabilities, Security Best Practices, OAuth Compliance, OAuth Configuration, OAuth Middleware, OAuth with HTTP Headers, OAuth Errors, OAuth in Enterprise, OAuth Service Accounts, OAuth Proxy, OAuth Delegation, OAuth Auditing, OAuth Monitoring, OAuth Logging, OAuth Rate Limiting, OAuth Token Binding, OAuth2 Device Flow, Dynamic Client Registration, OAuth Server Metadata, OAuth Discovery, OAuth Certifications, OAuth Community, OAuth Education, OAuth Testing Tools, OAuth Documentation, OAuth2 Frameworks, OAuth Version Comparison, OAuth History, OAuth Extensions, OAuth Metrics, OAuth Performance Optimization, OAuth Impact on Business, OAuth Adoption Challenges, OAuth Industry Standards, OAuth and GDPR, OAuth and Compliance, OAuth and Privacy, OAuth and Cryptography, OAuth Best Practices, OAuth Updates, OAuth User Stories, OAuth Legacy Systems, OAuth Interoperability, OAuth Deprecation, OAuth Security Analysis, OAuth Integration Patterns, OAuth and IoT, OAuth and Blockchain.
OAuth Vendors: Google, Microsoft, Facebook, Amazon, Twitter, Apple, GitHub, Salesforce, Okta, Auth0, Ping Identity, OneLogin, IBM, Oracle, LinkedIn, Yahoo, Adobe, Dropbox, Spotify, Slack.
OAuth Products: Microsoft Azure Active Directory, GitHub OAuth Apps, Amazon Cognito, Google OAuth 2.0, Google Cloud Identity, IBM Cloud App ID, Oracle Identity Cloud Service, Facebook Login, Apple Sign In, Microsoft Identity Platform, GitHub Apps, Amazon Security Token Service, Google Identity Services, Google Cloud IAM, IBM Security Access Manager, Oracle Access Manager, Facebook Access Token Handling, Apple Game Center Authentication, Microsoft Graph API, GitHub Personal Access Tokens, Amazon IAM Roles Anywhere, Google Workspace Admin SDK, Google Play Services Authentication, IBM Cloud IAM, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure Identity and Access Management.
GitHub OAuth, Awesome OAuth. (navbar_oauth - see also navbar_iam, navbar_passkeys, navbar_passwords, navbar_security)
Code review and JWT Tokens
See: Code review and JWT Tokens
Return to Code review, JWT Tokens, Code review Security, Security, Code review Authorization with OAuth, Code review and the OWASP Top 10
Summarize this topic in 20 paragraphs. Give code examples. Make the Wikipedia or other references URLs as raw URLs. Put a section heading for each paragraph. Section headings must start and end with 2 equals signs. Do not put double square brackets around words in section headings. You MUST ALWAYS put double square brackets around EVERY acronym, product name, company or corporation name, name of a person, country, state, place, years, dates, buzzword, slang, jargon or technical words. REMEMBER, you MUST MUST ALWAYS put double square brackets around EVERY acronym!
Fair Use Sources
- Code review for Archive Access for Fair Use Preservation, quoting, paraphrasing, excerpting and/or commenting upon
Code review and the OWASP Top 10
See: Code review and the OWASP Top 10
Return to Code review, OWASP Top Ten, Code review Security, Security, Code review Authorization with OAuth, Code review and JWT Tokens
Code review and the OWASP Top 10
Discuss how OWASP Top 10 is supported by Code review. Give code examples. Summarize this topic in 20 paragraphs. Make the Wikipedia or other references URLs as raw URLs. Put a section heading for each paragraph. Section headings must start and end with 2 equals signs. Do not put double square brackets around words in section headings. You MUST ALWAYS put double square brackets around EVERY acronym, product name, company or corporation name, name of a person, country, state, place, years, dates, buzzword, slang, jargon or technical words. REMEMBER, you MUST MUST ALWAYS put double square brackets around EVERY acronym!
Fair Use Sources
- Code review for Archive Access for Fair Use Preservation, quoting, paraphrasing, excerpting and/or commenting upon
Code review and Broken Access Control
See: Code review and Broken Access Control
Return to Code review and the OWASP Top 10, Broken Access Control, OWASP Top Ten, Code review, Code review Security, Security, Code review Authorization with OAuth, Code review and JWT Tokens
Code review and Broken Access Control
Discuss how Broken Access Control is prevented in Code review. Give code examples. Summarize this topic in 11 paragraphs. Make the Wikipedia or other references URLs as raw URLs. Put a section heading for each paragraph. Section headings must start and end with 2 equals signs. Do not put double square brackets around words in section headings. You MUST ALWAYS put double square brackets around EVERY acronym, product name, company or corporation name, name of a person, country, state, place, years, dates, buzzword, slang, jargon or technical words. REMEMBER, you MUST MUST ALWAYS put double square brackets around EVERY acronym!
Code review Programming Languages
See: Programming Languages for Code review
Return to Code review
Code review Programming Languages:
Discuss which programming languages are supported. Give code examples comparing them. Summarize this topic in 10 paragraphs. Make the Wikipedia or other references URLs as raw URLs. Put a section heading for each paragraph. Section headings must start and end with 2 equals signs. Do not put double square brackets around words in section headings. You MUST ALWAYS put double square brackets around EVERY acronym, product name, company or corporation name, name of a person, country, state, place, years, dates, buzzword, slang, jargon or technical words. REMEMBER, you MUST MUST ALWAYS put double square brackets around EVERY acronym!
Code review and TypeScript
Return to Code review, TypeScript
Discuss how TypeScript is supported by Code review. Give code examples. Summarize this topic in 11 paragraphs. Make the Wikipedia or other references URLs as raw URLs. Put a section heading for each paragraph. Section headings must start and end with 2 equals signs. Do not put double square brackets around words in section headings. You MUST ALWAYS put double square brackets around EVERY acronym, product name, company or corporation name, name of a person, country, state, place, years, dates, buzzword, slang, jargon or technical words. REMEMBER, you MUST MUST ALWAYS put double square brackets around EVERY acronym!
Code review and TypeScript
Return to Code review, TypeScript
Discuss how TypeScript is supported by Code review. Give code examples. Summarize this topic in 11 paragraphs. Make the Wikipedia or other references URLs as raw URLs. Put a section heading for each paragraph. Section headings must start and end with 2 equals signs. Do not put double square brackets around words in section headings. You MUST ALWAYS put double square brackets around EVERY acronym, product name, company or corporation name, name of a person, country, state, place, years, dates, buzzword, slang, jargon or technical words. REMEMBER, you MUST MUST ALWAYS put double square brackets around EVERY acronym!
Code review and IDEs, Code Editors and Development Tools
See: Code review and IDEs, Code Editors and Development Tools
Return to Code review, IDEs, Code Editors and Development Tools
Discuss which IDEs, Code Editors and other Development Tools are supported. Discuss which programming languages are most commonly used. Summarize this topic in 15 paragraphs. Make the Wikipedia or other references URLs as raw URLs. Put a section heading for each paragraph. Section headings must start and end with 2 equals signs. Do not put double square brackets around words in section headings. You MUST ALWAYS put double square brackets around EVERY acronym, product name, company or corporation name, name of a person, country, state, place, years, dates, buzzword, slang, jargon or technical words. REMEMBER, you MUST MUST ALWAYS put double square brackets around EVERY acronym!
Code review and the Command-Line
Return to Code review, code_reviews
Code review Command-Line Interface - Code review CLI:
Create a list of the top 40 Code review CLI commands with no description or definitions. Sort by most common. Include NO description or definitions. Put double square brackets around each topic. Don't number them, separate each topic with only a comma and 1 space.
Code review Command-Line Interface - Code review CLI:
Summarize this topic in 15 paragraphs with descriptions and examples for the most commonly used CLI commands. Make the Wikipedia or other references URLs as raw URLs. Put a section heading for each paragraph. Section headings must start and end with 2 equals signs. Do not put double square brackets around words in section headings. You MUST ALWAYS put double square brackets around EVERY acronym, product name, company or corporation name, name of a person, country, state, place, years, dates, buzzword, slang, jargon or technical words. REMEMBER, you MUST MUST ALWAYS put double square brackets around EVERY acronym!
Code review and 3rd Party Libraries
Return to Code review, code_reviews
Code review and 3rd Party Libraries
Discuss common 3rd Party Libraries used with Code review. Give code examples. Summarize this topic in 15 paragraphs. Make the Wikipedia or other references URLs as raw URLs. Put a section heading for each paragraph. Section headings must start and end with 2 equals signs. Do not put double square brackets around words in section headings. You MUST ALWAYS put double square brackets around EVERY acronym, product name, company or corporation name, name of a person, country, state, place, years, dates, buzzword, slang, jargon or technical words. REMEMBER, you MUST MUST ALWAYS put double square brackets around EVERY acronym!
Code review and Unit Testing
Return to Code review, Unit Testing
Discuss how unit testing is supported by Code review. Give code examples. Summarize this topic in 12 paragraphs. Make the Wikipedia or other references URLs as raw URLs. Put a section heading for each paragraph. Section headings must start and end with 2 equals signs. Do not put double square brackets around words in section headings. You MUST ALWAYS put double square brackets around EVERY acronym, product name, company or corporation name, name of a person, country, state, place, years, dates, buzzword, slang, jargon or technical words. REMEMBER, you MUST MUST ALWAYS put double square brackets around EVERY acronym!
Code review and Test-Driven Development
Return to Code review, code_reviews
Code review and Test-Driven Development:
Discuss how TDD is supported by Code review. Give code examples. Summarize this topic in 20 paragraphs. Make the Wikipedia or other references URLs as raw URLs. Put a section heading for each paragraph. Section headings must start and end with 2 equals signs. Do not put double square brackets around words in section headings. You MUST ALWAYS put double square brackets around EVERY acronym, product name, company or corporation name, name of a person, country, state, place, years, dates, buzzword, slang, jargon or technical words. REMEMBER, you MUST MUST ALWAYS put double square brackets around EVERY acronym!
Code review and Performance
Return to Code review, Performance
Discuss performance and Code review. Give code examples. Summarize this topic in 20 paragraphs. Make the Wikipedia or other references URLs as raw URLs. Put a section heading for each paragraph. Section headings must start and end with 2 equals signs. Do not put double square brackets around words in section headings. You MUST ALWAYS put double square brackets around EVERY acronym, product name, company or corporation name, name of a person, country, state, place, years, dates, buzzword, slang, jargon or technical words. REMEMBER, you MUST MUST ALWAYS put double square brackets around EVERY acronym!
Code review and Functional Programming
Return to Code review, Functional Programming
Code review and Functional Programming:
Discuss functional programming and Code review. Give code examples. Summarize this topic in 20 paragraphs. Make the Wikipedia or other references URLs as raw URLs. Put a section heading for each paragraph. Section headings must start and end with 2 equals signs. Do not put double square brackets around words in section headings. You MUST ALWAYS put double square brackets around EVERY acronym, product name, company or corporation name, name of a person, country, state, place, years, dates, buzzword, slang, jargon or technical words. REMEMBER, you MUST MUST ALWAYS put double square brackets around EVERY acronym!
Code review and Asynchronous Programming
Return to Code review, Asynchronous Programming
Code review and Asynchronous Programming:
Discuss asynchronous programming and Code review. Give code examples. Summarize this topic in 20 paragraphs. Make the Wikipedia or other references URLs as raw URLs. Put a section heading for each paragraph. Section headings must start and end with 2 equals signs. Do not put double square brackets around words in section headings. You MUST ALWAYS put double square brackets around EVERY acronym, product name, company or corporation name, name of a person, country, state, place, years, dates, buzzword, slang, jargon or technical words. REMEMBER, you MUST MUST ALWAYS put double square brackets around EVERY acronym!
Code review and Serverless FaaS
Return to Code review, Serverless FaaS
Code review and Serverless FaaS:
Discuss Serverless FaaS and Code review. Give code examples. Summarize this topic in 20 paragraphs. Make the Wikipedia or other references URLs as raw URLs. Put a section heading for each paragraph. Section headings must start and end with 2 equals signs. Do not put double square brackets around words in section headings. You MUST ALWAYS put double square brackets around EVERY acronym, product name, company or corporation name, name of a person, country, state, place, years, dates, buzzword, slang, jargon or technical words. REMEMBER, you MUST MUST ALWAYS put double square brackets around EVERY acronym!
Code review and Microservices
Return to Code review, Microservices
Code review and Microservices:
Discuss microservices and Code review. Give code examples. Summarize this topic in 20 paragraphs. Make the Wikipedia or other references URLs as raw URLs. Put a section heading for each paragraph. Section headings must start and end with 2 equals signs. Do not put double square brackets around words in section headings. You MUST ALWAYS put double square brackets around EVERY acronym, product name, company or corporation name, name of a person, country, state, place, years, dates, buzzword, slang, jargon or technical words. REMEMBER, you MUST MUST ALWAYS put double square brackets around EVERY acronym!
Code review and React
Return to Code review, React
Discuss React integration with Code review. Give code examples. Summarize this topic in 20 paragraphs. Make the Wikipedia or other references URLs as raw URLs. Put a section heading for each paragraph. Section headings must start and end with 2 equals signs. Do not put double square brackets around words in section headings. You MUST ALWAYS put double square brackets around EVERY acronym, product name, company or corporation name, name of a person, country, state, place, years, dates, buzzword, slang, jargon or technical words. REMEMBER, you MUST MUST ALWAYS put double square brackets around EVERY acronym!
Code review and Angular
Return to Code review, Angular
Discuss Angular integration with Code review. Give code examples. Summarize this topic in 20 paragraphs. Make the Wikipedia or other references URLs as raw URLs. Put a section heading for each paragraph. Section headings must start and end with 2 equals signs. Do not put double square brackets around words in section headings. You MUST ALWAYS put double square brackets around EVERY acronym, product name, company or corporation name, name of a person, country, state, place, years, dates, buzzword, slang, jargon or technical words. REMEMBER, you MUST MUST ALWAYS put double square brackets around EVERY acronym!
Code review and Vue.js
Return to Code review, Vue.js
Discuss Vue.js integration with Code review. Give code examples. Summarize this topic in 20 paragraphs. Make the Wikipedia or other references URLs as raw URLs. Put a section heading for each paragraph. Section headings must start and end with 2 equals signs. Do not put double square brackets around words in section headings. You MUST ALWAYS put double square brackets around EVERY acronym, product name, company or corporation name, name of a person, country, state, place, years, dates, buzzword, slang, jargon or technical words. REMEMBER, you MUST MUST ALWAYS put double square brackets around EVERY acronym!
Code review and Spring Framework
Return to Code review, Spring Framework
Code review and Spring Framework / Code review and Spring Boot:
Discuss Spring Framework integration with Code review. Give code examples. Summarize this topic in 20 paragraphs. Make the Wikipedia or other references URLs as raw URLs. Put a section heading for each paragraph. Section headings must start and end with 2 equals signs. Do not put double square brackets around words in section headings. You MUST ALWAYS put double square brackets around EVERY acronym, product name, company or corporation name, name of a person, country, state, place, years, dates, buzzword, slang, jargon or technical words. REMEMBER, you MUST MUST ALWAYS put double square brackets around EVERY acronym!
Code review and Microsoft .NET
Return to Code review, Microsoft dot NET | Microsoft .NET
Code review and Microsoft .NET:
Discuss Code review for Microsoft .NET 8. Give code examples. Summarize this topic in 20 paragraphs. Make the Wikipedia or other references URLs as raw URLs. Put a section heading for each paragraph. Section headings must start and end with 2 equals signs. Do not put double square brackets around words in section headings. You MUST ALWAYS put double square brackets around EVERY acronym, product name, company or corporation name, name of a person, country, state, place, years, dates, buzzword, slang, jargon or technical words. REMEMBER, you MUST MUST ALWAYS put double square brackets around EVERY acronym!
Code review and RESTful APIs
Return to Code review, RESTful APIs
Discuss RESTful APIs integration with Code review. Give code examples. Summarize this topic in 20 paragraphs. Make the Wikipedia or other references URLs as raw URLs. Put a section heading for each paragraph. Section headings must start and end with 2 equals signs. Do not put double square brackets around words in section headings. You MUST ALWAYS put double square brackets around EVERY acronym, product name, company or corporation name, name of a person, country, state, place, years, dates, buzzword, slang, jargon or technical words. REMEMBER, you MUST MUST ALWAYS put double square brackets around EVERY acronym!
Code review and OpenAPI
Return to Code review, OpenAPI
Discuss OpenAPI integration with Code review. Give code examples. Summarize this topic in 20 paragraphs. Make the Wikipedia or other references URLs as raw URLs. Put a section heading for each paragraph. Section headings must start and end with 2 equals signs. Do not put double square brackets around words in section headings. You MUST ALWAYS put double square brackets around EVERY acronym, product name, company or corporation name, name of a person, country, state, place, years, dates, buzzword, slang, jargon or technical words. REMEMBER, you MUST MUST ALWAYS put double square brackets around EVERY acronym!
Code review and FastAPI
Return to Code review, FastAPI
Discuss FastAPI integration with Code review. Give code examples. Summarize this topic in 20 paragraphs. Make the Wikipedia or other references URLs as raw URLs. Put a section heading for each paragraph. Section headings must start and end with 2 equals signs. Do not put double square brackets around words in section headings. You MUST ALWAYS put double square brackets around EVERY acronym, product name, company or corporation name, name of a person, country, state, place, years, dates, buzzword, slang, jargon or technical words. REMEMBER, you MUST MUST ALWAYS put double square brackets around EVERY acronym!
Code review and GraphQL
Return to Code review, GraphQL
Discuss GraphQL integration with Code review. Give code examples. Summarize this topic in 20 paragraphs. Make the Wikipedia or other references URLs as raw URLs. Put a section heading for each paragraph. Section headings must start and end with 2 equals signs. Do not put double square brackets around words in section headings. You MUST ALWAYS put double square brackets around EVERY acronym, product name, company or corporation name, name of a person, country, state, place, years, dates, buzzword, slang, jargon or technical words. REMEMBER, you MUST MUST ALWAYS put double square brackets around EVERY acronym!
Code review and gRPC
Return to Code review, gRPC
Discuss gRPC integration with Code review. Give code examples. Summarize this topic in 20 paragraphs. Make the Wikipedia or other references URLs as raw URLs. Put a section heading for each paragraph. Section headings must start and end with 2 equals signs. Do not put double square brackets around words in section headings. You MUST ALWAYS put double square brackets around EVERY acronym, product name, company or corporation name, name of a person, country, state, place, years, dates, buzzword, slang, jargon or technical words. REMEMBER, you MUST MUST ALWAYS put double square brackets around EVERY acronym!
Code review and Node.js
Return to Code review, Node.js
Discuss Node.js usage with Code review. Give code examples. Summarize this topic in 20 paragraphs. Make the Wikipedia or other references URLs as raw URLs. Put a section heading for each paragraph. Section headings must start and end with 2 equals signs. Do not put double square brackets around words in section headings. You MUST ALWAYS put double square brackets around EVERY acronym, product name, company or corporation name, name of a person, country, state, place, years, dates, buzzword, slang, jargon or technical words. REMEMBER, you MUST MUST ALWAYS put double square brackets around EVERY acronym! REMEMBER, you MUST MUST ALWAYS put double square brackets around EVERY acronym!
Code review and Deno
Return to Code review, Deno
Discuss Deno usage with Code review. Give code examples. Summarize this topic in 20 paragraphs. Make the Wikipedia or other references URLs as raw URLs. Put a section heading for each paragraph. Section headings must start and end with 2 equals signs. Do not put double square brackets around words in section headings. You MUST ALWAYS put double square brackets around EVERY acronym, product name, company or corporation name, name of a person, country, state, place, years, dates, buzzword, slang, jargon or technical words. REMEMBER, you MUST MUST ALWAYS put double square brackets around EVERY acronym!
Code review and Containerization
Return to Code review, Containerization
Code review and Containerization:
Discuss Containerization and Code review. Give code examples. Summarize this topic in 20 paragraphs. Make the Wikipedia or other references URLs as raw URLs. Put a section heading for each paragraph. Section headings must start and end with 2 equals signs. Do not put double square brackets around words in section headings. You MUST ALWAYS put double square brackets around EVERY acronym, product name, company or corporation name, name of a person, country, state, place, years, dates, buzzword, slang, jargon or technical words. REMEMBER, you MUST MUST ALWAYS put double square brackets around EVERY acronym!
Code review and Docker
Return to Code review, Docker, Containerization
Discuss Docker and Code review. Give code examples. Summarize this topic in 20 paragraphs. Make the Wikipedia or other references URLs as raw URLs. Put a section heading for each paragraph. Section headings must start and end with 2 equals signs. Do not put double square brackets around words in section headings. You MUST ALWAYS put double square brackets around EVERY acronym, product name, company or corporation name, name of a person, country, state, place, years, dates, buzzword, slang, jargon or technical words. REMEMBER, you MUST MUST ALWAYS put double square brackets around EVERY acronym!
Code review and Podman
Return to Code review, Podman, Containerization
Discuss Podman and Code review. Give code examples. Summarize this topic in 20 paragraphs. Make the Wikipedia or other references URLs as raw URLs. Put a section heading for each paragraph. Section headings must start and end with 2 equals signs. Do not put double square brackets around words in section headings. You MUST ALWAYS put double square brackets around EVERY acronym, product name, company or corporation name, name of a person, country, state, place, years, dates, buzzword, slang, jargon or technical words. REMEMBER, you MUST MUST ALWAYS put double square brackets around EVERY acronym!
Code review and Kubernetes
Return to Code review, Kubernetes, Containerization
Discuss Kubernetes and Code review. Give code examples. Summarize this topic in 20 paragraphs. Make the Wikipedia or other references URLs as raw URLs. Put a section heading for each paragraph. Section headings must start and end with 2 equals signs. Do not put double square brackets around words in section headings. You MUST ALWAYS put double square brackets around EVERY acronym, product name, company or corporation name, name of a person, country, state, place, years, dates, buzzword, slang, jargon or technical words. REMEMBER, you MUST MUST ALWAYS put double square brackets around EVERY acronym!
Code review and WebAssembly / Wasm
Return to Code review, WebAssembly / Wasm
Discuss how WebAssembly / Wasm is supported by Code review. Give code examples. Summarize this topic in 20 paragraphs. Make the Wikipedia or other references URLs as raw URLs. Put a section heading for each paragraph. Section headings must start and end with 2 equals signs. Do not put double square brackets around words in section headings. You MUST ALWAYS put double square brackets around EVERY acronym, product name, company or corporation name, name of a person, country, state, place, years, dates, buzzword, slang, jargon or technical words. REMEMBER, you MUST MUST ALWAYS put double square brackets around EVERY acronym!
Code review and Middleware
Return to Code review, Middleware
Summarize this topic in 10 paragraphs. Give code examples. Make the Wikipedia or other references URLs as raw URLs. Put a section heading for each paragraph. Section headings must start and end with 2 equals signs. Do not put double square brackets around words in section headings. You MUST ALWAYS put double square brackets around EVERY acronym, product name, company or corporation name, name of a person, country, state, place, years, dates, buzzword, slang, jargon or technical words. REMEMBER, you MUST MUST ALWAYS put double square brackets around EVERY acronym!
Code review and ORMs
Return to Code review, ORMs
Summarize this topic in 10 paragraphs. Give code examples. Make the Wikipedia or other references URLs as raw URLs. Put a section heading for each paragraph. Section headings must start and end with 2 equals signs. Do not put double square brackets around words in section headings. You MUST ALWAYS put double square brackets around EVERY acronym, product name, company or corporation name, name of a person, country, state, place, years, dates, buzzword, slang, jargon or technical words. REMEMBER, you MUST MUST ALWAYS put double square brackets around EVERY acronym!
Code review and Object Data Modeling (ODM)
Return to Code review, Object Data Modeling (ODM)
Code review and Object Data Modeling (ODM) such as Mongoose
Summarize this topic in 10 paragraphs. Give code examples. Make the Wikipedia or other references URLs as raw URLs. Put a section heading for each paragraph. Section headings must start and end with 2 equals signs. Do not put double square brackets around words in section headings. You MUST ALWAYS put double square brackets around EVERY acronym, product name, company or corporation name, name of a person, country, state, place, years, dates, buzzword, slang, jargon or technical words. REMEMBER, you MUST MUST ALWAYS put double square brackets around EVERY acronym!
Code review Automation with Python
Return to Code review, Automation with Python
Code review Automation with Python
Summarize this topic in 24 paragraphs. Give 12 code examples. Make the Wikipedia or other references URLs as raw URLs. Put a section heading for each paragraph. Section headings must start and end with 2 equals signs. Do not put double square brackets around words in section headings. You MUST ALWAYS put double square brackets around EVERY acronym, product name, company or corporation name, name of a person, country, state, place, years, dates, buzzword, slang, jargon or technical words. REMEMBER, you MUST MUST ALWAYS put double square brackets around EVERY acronym!
Code review Automation with Java
Return to Code review, Automation with Java
Code review Automation with Java
Summarize this topic in 12 paragraphs. Give 6 code examples. Make the Wikipedia or other references URLs as raw URLs. Put a section heading for each paragraph. Section headings must start and end with 2 equals signs. Do not put double square brackets around words in section headings. You MUST ALWAYS put double square brackets around EVERY acronym, product name, company or corporation name, name of a person, country, state, place, years, dates, buzzword, slang, jargon or technical words. REMEMBER, you MUST MUST ALWAYS put double square brackets around EVERY acronym!
Code review Automation with Kotlin
Return to Code review, Automation with Java
Code review Automation with Kotlin
Summarize this topic in 12 paragraphs. Give 6 code examples. Make the Wikipedia or other references URLs as raw URLs. Put a section heading for each paragraph. Section headings must start and end with 2 equals signs. Do not put double square brackets around words in section headings. You MUST ALWAYS put double square brackets around EVERY acronym, product name, company or corporation name, name of a person, country, state, place, years, dates, buzzword, slang, jargon or technical words. REMEMBER, you MUST MUST ALWAYS put double square brackets around EVERY acronym!
Code review Automation with JavaScript using Node.js
Return to Code review, Automation with JavaScript using Node.js
Code review Automation with JavaScript using Node.js
Summarize this topic in 20 paragraphs. Give 15 code examples. Make the Wikipedia or other references URLs as raw URLs. Put a section heading for each paragraph. Section headings must start and end with 2 equals signs. Do not put double square brackets around words in section headings. You MUST ALWAYS put double square brackets around EVERY acronym, product name, company or corporation name, name of a person, country, state, place, years, dates, buzzword, slang, jargon or technical words. REMEMBER, you MUST MUST ALWAYS put double square brackets around EVERY acronym!
Code review Automation with Golang
Return to Code review, Automation with Golang
Code review Automation with Golang
Summarize this topic in 20 paragraphs. Give 15 code examples. Make the Wikipedia or other references URLs as raw URLs. Put a section heading for each paragraph. Section headings must start and end with 2 equals signs. Do not put double square brackets around words in section headings. You MUST ALWAYS put double square brackets around EVERY acronym, product name, company or corporation name, name of a person, country, state, place, years, dates, buzzword, slang, jargon or technical words. REMEMBER, you MUST MUST ALWAYS put double square brackets around EVERY acronym!
Code review Automation with Rust
Return to Code review, Automation with Rust
Code review Automation with Rust
Summarize this topic in 20 paragraphs. Give 15 code examples. Make the Wikipedia or other references URLs as raw URLs. Put a section heading for each paragraph. Section headings must start and end with 2 equals signs. Do not put double square brackets around words in section headings. You MUST ALWAYS put double square brackets around EVERY acronym, product name, company or corporation name, name of a person, country, state, place, years, dates, buzzword, slang, jargon or technical words. REMEMBER, you MUST MUST ALWAYS put double square brackets around EVERY acronym!
Code review Glossary
Return to Code review, Code review Glossary
Give 10 related glossary terms with definitions. Don't number them. Each topic on a separate line followed by a second carriage return. Right after the English term, list the equivalent French term. You MUST put double square brackets around each computer buzzword or jargon or technical words.
Give another 10 related glossary terms with definitions. Right after the English term, list the equivalent French term. Don't repeat what you already listed. Don't number them. You MUST put double square brackets around each computer buzzword or jargon or technical words.
Research It More
Fair Use Sources
- Code review for Archive Access for Fair Use Preservation, quoting, paraphrasing, excerpting and/or commenting upon
Code review: Code review Glossary, Code review Alternatives, Code review versus React, Code review versus Angular, Code review versus Vue.js, Code review Best Practices, Code review Anti-Patterns, Code review Security, Code review and OAuth, Code review and JWT Tokens, Code review and OWASP Top Ten, Code review and Programming Languages, Code review and TypeScript, Code review and IDEs, Code review Command-Line Interface, Code review and 3rd Party Libraries, Code review and Unit Testing, Code review and Test-Driven Development, Code review and Performance, Code review and Functional Programming, Code review and Asynchronous Programming, Code review and Containerization, Code review and Docker, Code review and Podman, Code review and Kubernetes, Code review and WebAssembly, Code review and Node.js, Code review and Deno, Code review and Serverless FaaS, Code review and Microservices, Code review and RESTful APIs, Code review and OpenAPI, Code review and FastAPI, Code review and GraphQL, Code review and gRPC, Code review Automation with JavaScript, Python and Code review, Java and Code review, JavaScript and Code review, TypeScript and Code review, Code review Alternatives, Code review Bibliography, Code review DevOps - Code review SRE - Code review CI/CD, Cloud Native Code review - Code review Microservices - Serverless Code review, Code review Security - Code review DevSecOps, Functional Code review, Code review Concurrency, Async Code review, Code review and Middleware, Code review and Data Science - Code review and Databases - Code review and Object Data Modeling (ODM) - Code review and ORMs, Code review and Machine Learning, Code review Courses, Awesome Code review, Code review GitHub, Code review Topics: Most Common Topics:
. (navbar_Code review – see also navbar_full_stack, navbar_javascript, navbar_node.js, navbar_software_architecture)
Create a list of the top 100 Code review topics with no description or definitions. Sort by most common. Include NO description or definitions. Put double square brackets around each topic. Don't number them, separate each topic with only a comma and 1 space.
Programming: Programming languages
Variables and Data Types, Control Structures, Functions and Methods, Object-Oriented Programming (OOP), Functional Programming, Procedural Programming, Event-Driven Programming, Concurrent and Parallel Programming, Error Handling and Debugging, Memory Management, Recursion, Algorithms, Data Structures, Design Patterns, Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC), Version Control Systems, Database Programming, Web Development, Mobile App Development, Game Development, Machine Learning and AI Programming, Network Programming, API Development, Security in Programming, Testing and Quality Assurance, User Interface and User Experience Design, Scripting Languages, Assembly Language, High-Level Programming Languages, Low-Level Programming Languages, Compiler Design, Interpreter Design, Garbage Collection, Regular Expressions, Graphical User Interface (GUI) Programming, Command Line Interface Development, Cross-Platform Development, Cloud Computing in Programming, Blockchain Programming, IoT Programming, Embedded Systems Programming, Microservices Architecture, Serverless Architecture, Big Data Technologies, Data Visualization, Data Mining and Analysis, Natural Language Processing (NLP), Computer Graphics Programming, Virtual Reality (VR) Development, Augmented Reality (AR) Development, Cryptography in Programming, Distributed Systems, Real-Time Systems Programming, Operating System Development, Compiler and Interpreter Development, Quantum Computing, Software Project Management, Agile Methodologies, DevOps Practices, Continuous Integration and Continuous Deployment (CI/CD), Software Maintenance and Evolution, Software Licensing, Open Source Development, Accessibility in Software Development, Internationalization and Localization, Performance Optimization, Scalability Techniques, Code Refactoring, Design Principles, API Design, Data Modeling, Software Documentation, Peer-to-Peer Networking, Socket Programming, Front-End Development, Back-End Development, Full Stack Development, Secure Coding Practices, Code Reviews, Unit Testing, Integration Testing, System Testing, Functional Programming Paradigms, Imperative Programming, Declarative Programming, Software Architecture, Cloud-Native Development, Infrastructure as Code (IaC), Ethical Hacking for Developers, Artificial Intelligence Ethics in Programming, Software Compliance and Standards, Software Auditing, Debugging Tools and Techniques, Code Optimization Techniques, Software Deployment Strategies, End-User Computing, Computational Thinking, Programming Logic and Techniques, Advanced Data Management
Agile, algorithms, APIs, asynchronous programming, automation, backend, CI/CD, classes, CLI, client-side, cloud (Cloud Native-AWS-Azure-GCP-IBM Cloud-IBM Mainframe-OCI), comments, compilers, concurrency, conditional expressions, containers, control flow, databases, data manipulation, data persistence, data science, data serialization, data structures, dates and times, debugging, dependency injection, design patterns, DevOps, distributed software, Docker, error handling, file I/O, frameworks, frontend, functions, functional programming, GitHub, history, Homebrew, IDEs, installation, JetBrains, JSON, JSON Web Token (JWT), K8S, lambdas, language spec, libraries, linters, Linux, logging, macOS, methods, ML, microservices, mobile dev, modules, monitoring, multi-threaded, network programming, null, numbers, objects, object-oriented programming, observability, OOP, ORMs, packages, package managers, performance, programmers, programming, reactive, refactoring, reserved words, REST APIs, RHEL, SDK, secrets, security, serverless, server-side, Snapcraft, SQL, StackOverflow, standards, standard library, statements, scope, scripting, syntax, systems programming, TDD, testing, tools, type system, web dev, variables, versions, Ubuntu, unit testing, Windows; topics-courses-books-docs. (navbar_programming - see also navbar_variables, navbar_programming_libraries, navbar_data_structures, navbar_algorithms, navbar_software_architecture, navbar_agile)