https://DevOpsCloud.io -- Cloud Monk Losang Jinpa, Ph.D., MCSE/MCT, GitOps DevOps Engineer

CPP Memory Model

CPP Memory Model equivalents: Compare and contrast for Python, PowerShell, Bash, Rust, Golang, JavaScript, TypeScript, Java, Kotlin, Scala, Clojure, Haskell, F Sharp, Erlang, Elixir, Swift, C Sharp, CPP, C Language, Zig, PHP, Ruby, Dart, Microsoft T-SQL, Oracle PL/SQL, PL/pgSQL, Julia, R Language, Perl, COBOL, Fortran, Ada, VBScript, Basic, Pascal.

CPP Memory Model Equivalents: Compare and Contrast

CPP Memory Model provides control over stack and heap memory, supporting manual allocation (`malloc`, `free`) and advanced features like smart pointers and atomic operations. Below is a comparison with equivalents in other programming languages.

Python

Memory Model: Automatic garbage collection and reference counting.
Strengths: Simplifies memory management for developers.
Weaknesses: Limited control over low-level memory operations.

PowerShell

Memory Model: Managed by the .NET runtime.
Strengths: Simplifies scripting for Windows environments.
Weaknesses: No low-level memory control or object lifecycle management.

Bash

Memory Model: No explicit memory model; relies on OS-level memory management.
Strengths: Lightweight for simple scripting tasks.
Weaknesses: No manual memory allocation capabilities.

Rust

Memory Model: Ownership model with borrow checker, stack, and heap management.
Strengths: Guarantees safety and eliminates memory leaks.
Weaknesses: Steep learning curve for new developers.

Golang

Memory Model: Garbage collection with pointers (no arithmetic).
Strengths: Simple and efficient for memory management.
Weaknesses: Limited control for memory-critical operations.

JavaScript

Memory Model: Garbage collection and implicit references.
Strengths: Abstracts memory management for developers.
Weaknesses: No low-level memory operations.

TypeScript

Memory Model: Same as JavaScript, with added type safety.
Strengths: Improves reliability with static typing.
Weaknesses: No enhancements for memory handling beyond JavaScript.

Java

Memory Model: Garbage collection, stack for threads, and heap for objects.
Strengths: Built-in concurrency support and thread-safe operations.
Weaknesses: No explicit memory management or control.

Kotlin

Memory Model: Same as Java, with additional null safety.
Strengths: Reduces runtime errors and improves developer experience.
Weaknesses: Limited low-level memory control.

Scala

Memory Model: JVM-based garbage collection with functional paradigms.
Strengths: Functional programming simplifies memory use.
Weaknesses: Overhead for memory-intensive tasks.

Clojure

Memory Model: Immutable data structures managed by JVM.
Strengths: Great for functional and concurrent programming.
Weaknesses: Inefficient for performance-critical applications.

Haskell

Memory Model: Garbage collection and lazy evaluation.
Strengths: Simplifies reasoning about program state.
Weaknesses: Not suitable for real-time systems or memory-intensive tasks.

F Sharp

Memory Model: Managed by .NET runtime with functional constructs.
Strengths: Ideal for memory-safe functional programming.
Weaknesses: Limited control for low-level memory operations.

Erlang

Memory Model: Isolated processes with no shared memory.
Strengths: Excellent for fault-tolerant distributed systems.
Weaknesses: Lacks manual memory control features.

Elixir

Memory Model: Same as Erlang.
Strengths: Optimized for distributed and scalable applications.
Weaknesses: Limited to BEAM ecosystem.

Swift

Memory Model: Automatic Reference Counting (ARC).
Strengths: Balances performance and ease of use.
Weaknesses: Retain cycles require manual intervention.

C Sharp

Memory Model: Managed by .NET garbage collector.
Strengths: Simplifies enterprise application development.
Weaknesses: No low-level memory control.

C Language

Memory Model: Manual memory management with `malloc` and `free`.
Strengths: Complete control over memory.
Weaknesses: Prone to memory leaks and segmentation faults.

Zig

Memory Model: Explicit memory allocation and deallocation.
Strengths: Lightweight and efficient for systems programming.
Weaknesses: Smaller ecosystem for advanced libraries.

PHP

Memory Model: Garbage collection and dynamic memory management.
Strengths: Simplifies development for web-based tasks.
Weaknesses: Inefficient for performance-critical applications.

Ruby

Memory Model: Garbage collection and dynamic memory handling.
Strengths: Simplifies memory usage in scripting.
Weaknesses: No low-level memory control.

Dart

Memory Model: Garbage collection with reference management.
Strengths: Optimized for UI and web-based workflows.
Weaknesses: Inefficient for low-level memory manipulation.

Microsoft T-SQL

Memory Model: Managed by the database engine.
Strengths: Optimized for database operations.
Weaknesses: No object-level memory control.

Oracle PL/SQL

Memory Model: Same as T-SQL.
Strengths: Reliable for database-specific tasks.
Weaknesses: Limited for general-purpose memory operations.

PL/pgSQL

Memory Model: Same as T-SQL for PostgreSQL.
Strengths: Tailored for database-specific memory tasks.
Weaknesses: No manual memory management.

Julia

Memory Model: Garbage collection optimized for numerical tasks.
Strengths: Ideal for scientific computations.
Weaknesses: No support for manual memory allocation.

R Language

Memory Model: Managed by garbage collection with lazy evaluation.
Strengths: Simplifies memory use for data analysis.
Weaknesses: Inefficient for real-time memory control.

Perl

Memory Model: Reference counting with garbage collection.
Strengths: Simplifies memory usage for scripting.
Weaknesses: Limited for high-performance tasks.

COBOL

Memory Model: Static memory allocation.
Strengths: Reliable for batch processing.
Weaknesses: No dynamic memory management features.

Fortran

Memory Model: Manual allocation for arrays and variables.
Strengths: High performance for numerical tasks.
Weaknesses: Outdated for modern memory management practices.

Ada

Memory Model: Strongly typed access types.
Strengths: Reliable for safety-critical applications.
Weaknesses: Verbose for dynamic memory operations.

VBScript

Memory Model: Implicit memory management.
Strengths: Simplifies scripting for basic tasks.
Weaknesses: No support for advanced memory operations.

Basic

Memory Model: Static memory allocation.
Strengths: Beginner-friendly for simple tasks.
Weaknesses: Outdated for modern applications.

Pascal

Memory Model: Manual memory management with `new` and `dispose`.
Strengths: Reliable for structured programming.
Weaknesses: Limited for low-level or high-performance tasks.

Comparison Table

Language	Memory Model	Strengths	Weaknesses
——————–	——————————————-	————————————-	————————————-
CPP	Manual memory management, pointers, stack, heap	High performance and flexibility	Prone to memory leaks and segmentation faults
Python	Garbage collection, reference counting	Simplifies memory handling	No low-level memory control
PowerShell	Managed by .NET runtime	Easy for scripting	No manual memory management
Bash	OS-level memory management	Lightweight for scripts	No explicit memory handling
Rust	Ownership model, borrow checker	Memory safety, prevents leaks	Steeper learning curve
Golang	Garbage collection with safe pointers	Simple and efficient	Less control for low-level tasks
JavaScript	Garbage collection with references	Abstracts memory management	No access to low-level memory
TypeScript	Same as JavaScript	Type safety improves reliability	Inherits JavaScript’s limitations
Java	Garbage collection, stack, and heap	Automatic memory handling	No manual memory control
Kotlin	Same as Java, null safety features	Reduces runtime errors	Limited for low-level programming
Scala	JVM-based garbage collection	Functional paradigms simplify memory use	Overhead compared to low-level control
Clojure	Immutable data, JVM garbage collection	Great for functional programming	Limited for performance-critical tasks
Haskell	Garbage collection, lazy evaluation	Simplifies functional workflows	Inefficient for real-time memory needs
F Sharp	.NET-based garbage collection	Reliable for functional programming	Limited for systems programming
Erlang	Isolated processes, no shared memory	Fault-tolerant for distributed systems	No pointer-like operations
Elixir	Same as Erlang	Scalable and fault-tolerant	Limited to BEAM ecosystem
Swift	Automatic Reference Counting (ARC)	Balances simplicity and performance	Retain cycles require manual intervention
C Sharp	Garbage collection in .NET	Simplifies enterprise applications	No low-level memory control
C Language	Manual memory allocation with `malloc`/`free`	High performance and control	Prone to memory errors
Zig	Explicit memory allocation, safe pointers	Lightweight and efficient	Small ecosystem for libraries
PHP	Garbage collection	Simplifies web application development	No low-level memory control
Ruby	Garbage collection	Abstracts memory handling	Inefficient for performance-critical tasks
Dart	Garbage collection with references	Optimized for UI and web development	Limited for memory-intensive applications
Microsoft T-SQL	Managed by the database engine	Simplifies database management	No low-level memory control
Oracle PL/SQL	Same as T-SQL	Great for database operations	Limited outside databases
PL/pgSQL	Same as T-SQL for PostgreSQL	Reliable for database tasks	No manual memory control
Julia	Garbage collection optimized for numerical tasks	Great for scientific workflows	No low-level memory manipulation
R Language	Garbage collection with lazy evaluation	Optimized for data analysis	Inefficient for real-time tasks
Perl	Reference counting, garbage collection	Simplifies text processing	Limited for memory-critical operations
COBOL	Static memory allocation	Reliable for legacy systems	No dynamic memory support
Fortran	Manual allocation for arrays	High performance for computations	Lacks modern memory management features
Ada	Strongly typed access types	Ensures safety and reliability	Verbose for complex operations
VBScript	Implicit memory handling	Simplifies small scripting tasks	No support for dynamic memory control
Basic	Static memory allocation	Beginner-friendly	Outdated for modern workflows
Pascal	Manual memory with `new`/`dispose`	Reliable for structured programming	Lacks advanced memory control

This table highlights how the memory models of these 35 languages compare to CPP Memory Model, showcasing their strengths and weaknesses in handling memory.

In-Depth

The CPP memory model defines the rules that govern how CPP objects (as defined by the CPP language introduced in the year 1985) are stored, accessed, and modified in memory. It was formally introduced and standardized as part of CPP11 (introduced in the year 2011), providing developers with a well-defined framework for reasoning about CPP code behavior under various hardware and compiler optimizations. Before this, different compilers and architectures implemented their own implicit models, sometimes causing unpredictable behavior in concurrent scenarios.

At the heart of the CPP memory model is the concept of memory visibility, which determines when changes to CPP objects made by one CPP thread become visible to another CPP thread. Prior to CPP11, this area was murky, and developers often relied on undefined or unspecified behavior. By specifying exactly what happens in terms of CPP memory operations, the CPP memory model allows programmers to write safer and more predictable CPP code.

The CPP memory model is closely related to concepts introduced by the ISO (introduced in the year 1947) standardized committees that refine and update the CPP standard over time. Through multiple revisions, including CPP98 (introduced in the year 1998) and CPP11, the community has worked to ensure that the rules governing CPP memory operations are consistent and robust. This careful standardization means that developers can rely on similar behavior across different compilers, such as GCC (introduced in the year 1987) or Clang (introduced in the year 2007), when writing concurrent CPP code.

One key aspect of the CPP memory model is the concept of atomic operations. Introduced as part of CPP11, CPP atomic operations allow developers to safely read and modify shared CPP objects from multiple CPP threads without requiring explicit locks. By guaranteeing a specific set of rules around synchronization and ordering, CPP atomic operations help prevent data races and make concurrent programming more straightforward and reliable.

The CPP memory model also defines the notion of memory ordering constraints. Different ordering modes, such as memory_order_relaxed, memory_order_release, memory_order_acquire, memory_order_acq_rel, and memory_order_seq_cst, allow developers to fine-tune the trade-offs between performance and predictability. CPP functions that operate on CPP atomic objects can use these modes to specify exactly how memory operations interact, ensuring that CPP threads see updates in the expected order.

Historically, many programmers struggled with concurrency and memory-related bugs when building complex applications, including those running on Linux (introduced in the year 1991), Windows (introduced in the year 1985), or macOS (introduced in the year 2001). The CPP memory model provides a language-level foundation for writing portable, efficient, and correct concurrent CPP code. This abstraction frees developers from relying solely on compiler or architecture-specific documentation and informal guidelines.

By clarifying the rules surrounding shared mutable state, the CPP memory model also improves interoperability with hardware architectures. On modern CPU designs, memory operations can be reordered or combined by the processor for optimization purposes. Without a well-defined memory model, developers would struggle to ensure correctness, especially in high-performance DevOps (introduced in the year 2009) scenarios where microservices or distributed systems may need precise synchronization and data consistency.

The CPP memory model encourages programmers to think carefully about how CPP objects are accessed and modified. In particular, it highlights the difference between using raw CPP pointers versus more advanced abstractions like smart pointers or concurrency-friendly containers provided by the CPP standard library (introduced in the year 1998). When combined with features like thread_local storage, the memory model helps developers design data structures that are both thread-safe and performant.

From a CPP class design perspective, understanding the CPP memory model is essential. The default operations on CPP objects, including construction, destruction, copy, and move, interact with memory in ways defined by the model. By following these rules, developers can create CPP classes that behave predictably when used in concurrent contexts, reducing the likelihood of unexpected behavior or subtle, hard-to-reproduce bugs.

The CPP memory model also underpins advanced CPP metaprogramming techniques and template-based concurrency solutions. As concurrency frameworks evolve, they rely on atomic operations and memory ordering guarantees to implement complex locking schemes, wait-free algorithms, and lock-free data structures. This provides the building blocks for reliable concurrency primitives that scale well in modern applications.

Tools and techniques for analyzing and debugging memory issues in CPP have improved significantly since the introduction of the CPP memory model. Static analyzers, sanitizers, and other developer tools can now detect misuses of CPP atomic operations or improper memory ordering constraints. By referencing the well-defined model, these tools provide actionable feedback, enabling developers to fix issues early in the development process.

The CPP memory model also intersects with other language features like CPP constexpr and CPP template metaprogramming. While these features are not directly about concurrency, understanding how the compiler and runtime handle memory can influence how programmers use compile-time computations and code generation. Ultimately, the memory model provides a unifying theme that influences design decisions at multiple levels of a CPP program.

In distributed or parallel computing environments, like those orchestrated by Kubernetes (introduced in the year 2014) or managed by cloud platforms such as AWS (introduced in the year 2006) or Azure (introduced in the year 2010), predictable memory behavior is crucial. The CPP memory model helps ensure that local concurrency primitives behave consistently, making it easier to scale up and integrate with complex systems composed of many interacting services.

Performance optimizations often rely on assumptions about how memory operations are ordered. By specifying these assumptions through CPP atomic operations and appropriate memory orderings, developers enable compilers and hardware to apply optimizations safely. The CPP memory model effectively bridges the gap between the needs of the developer for correctness and the needs of the system for speed.

When teaching new programmers, the CPP memory model can be introduced as part of advanced topics once basic concurrency patterns are understood. Concepts like data races, synchronization, and thread-safe programming become clearer when grounded in the formal rules of the memory model. This educational clarity empowers developers to think critically about how their CPP code behaves at runtime.

Historically, many concurrency guidelines and best practices emerged through trial and error. With the CPP memory model in place, these practices now have a well-defined foundation. Instead of relying solely on folklore, developers can reference the standard and trust that their code will behave consistently across compilers and hardware platforms.

As the CPP standard continues to evolve beyond CPP11, features introduced in CPP14 (introduced in the year 2014), CPP17 (introduced in the year 2017), and CPP20 (introduced in the year 2020) build on the strong concurrency foundations set by the memory model. Each new iteration refines these rules to simplify writing correct and efficient concurrent CPP code.

From a systems programming perspective, the CPP memory model has become indispensable. By enabling fine-grained control over memory access and synchronization, it supports the construction of systems software, high-performance servers, and embedded applications that must operate reliably under heavy concurrency demands.

In essence, the CPP memory model is about making concurrency explicit and predictable. It gives CPP programmers the tools to write code that works consistently on diverse platforms, from low-power embedded devices to high-performance servers. This universality is a hallmark of CPP and underlines why understanding the memory model is so important.

Finally, as software systems grow more complex and rely on concurrency as a fundamental aspect, the CPP memory model ensures that developers have a solid theoretical and practical basis for their code. Through well-defined semantics, it brings clarity, safety, and performance to concurrent programming, enabling developers to harness the full power of modern computing architectures.

CPP ABI (Application Binary Interface), CPP ABO (Asymmetric Binary Operation) , CPP Abstract Base Class, CPP Access Specifier, CPP Accumulate Algorithm, CPP Adapter Class, CPP Adaptive Composite Pattern, CPP Address Sanitizer, CPP Aggregate Initialization, CPP Aggregation Relationship, CPP Alignment Requirement, CPP Aligned Allocation, CPP Aligned Deallocation, CPP Aligned Storage, CPP Alignment-Support Types, CPP Allocator Adaptor, CPP Allocator Requirement, CPP Allocator-Aware Container, CPP Allocator-Extended Constructor, CPP Allocator-Extended Move Constructor, CPP Allocator-Extended Swap, CPP Allocation Function, CPP Allowable Exception Specification, CPP ALPHA Conversion (Renaming of Bound Variables), CPP Alternative Token, CPP Analysis-Based Optimization, CPP And Keyword, CPP And_Eq Keyword, CPP Angle Bracket Inclusion, CPP Anonymous Namespace, CPP Anti-Unification, CPP API Bindings for [[CPP Libraries]], CPP Argument Dependent Lookup, CPP Argument Pack, CPP Argument Unpacking, CPP Array Decay, CPP Array New Expression, CPP Array-Bound Safe Function, CPP Array-To-Pointer Conversion, CPP Articulated Lvalues, CPP Artificial Dependency Injection, CPP Artificial Instantiation, CPP Assert Macro, CPP Assigned-To Null Pointer Check, CPP AST (Abstract Syntax Tree), CPP AsIf Rule, CPP ASM Keyword, CPP Associated Type, CPP Assumption Hints, CPP Asynchronous Exception, CPP Atomic Compare-And-Exchange Operation, CPP Atomic Constraint, CPP Atomic Flag, CPP Atomic Operations Library, CPP Atomic Relaxed Operation, CPP Atomic Release-Acquire Operation, CPP Atomic Signal Fence, CPP Atomic Strong Compare Exchange, CPP Atomic Weak Compare Exchange, CPP Attribute Namespace, CPP Attribute Syntax, CPP Audit Keyword, CPP Auto Keyword, CPP Automatic Storage Duration, CPP Awaitable Type, CPP Background Thread in [[CPP]], CPP Back-Inserter Iterator, CPP Back-Inserter Iterator Adapter, CPP Backtrace Support, CPP Balanced Binary Tree In [[CPP]], CPP Bandwidth Optimization in [[CPP]], CPP Base Class Subobject, CPP Basic Exception Guarantee, CPP Basic Guarantee, CPP Basic Iostream, CPP Basic IOS, CPP Basic Istream, CPP Basic Ostream, CPP Basic Streambuf, CPP Begin Iterator, CPP Bessel Functions, CPP Bidir Iterator Category, CPP Bidirectional Iterator, CPP Big-O Notation in [[CPP Context]], CPP Binary Compatibility, CPP Binary Literal, CPP Binary Search Algorithm, CPP Binary Tree Implementation Detail, CPP Binding Pattern, CPP Bit Mask Operation, CPP Bit Shift Operation, CPP Bitand Keyword, CPP Bitfield Implementation, CPP Bitor Keyword, CPP Bitset Class, CPP Bitwise Complement, CPP Bitwise Operator Overload, CPP Block Scope, CPP Blocking Function Call, CPP Blocking I/O in [[CPP]], CPP Boilerplate Code Generation, CPP Bool Keyword, CPP Boolean Literal, CPP Brace Initialization, CPP Braced-Init-List, CPP Break Keyword, CPP Bridge Pattern in [[CPP]], CPP Built-In Type, CPP Built-In Function, CPP Built-In Operator, CPP Bundled Header Units, CPP Byte-Wise Operations, CPP Call Once Function, CPP Call Operator, CPP Callable Object, CPP Candidate Function, CPP Capacity Member Function, CPP Capturing Lambda, CPP Case Keyword, CPP Casting Operator Overload, CPP CDECL Calling Convention, CPP CeePlusPlus Language Linkage, CPP Character Literal, CPP Char16_T Keyword, CPP Char32_T Keyword, CPP Char Keyword, CPP Checked Iterators, CPP Chi-Squared Distribution, CPP Circular Buffer Implementation, CPP Class Key, CPP Class Member, CPP Class Scope, CPP Class Template, CPP Class Template Argument Deduction, CPP Class-Scoped Enumeration, CPP Cleanup Function, CPP Client-Side Abstraction, CPP Clocale Header, CPP Close Function for Streams, CPP Code Bloat Minimization, CPP Code Gen Optimization, CPP Code Generation Rule, CPP Code Smell Detection, CPP CoAwait Keyword, CPP CoReturn Keyword, CPP CoYield Keyword, CPP Collateral Class Template Instantiation, CPP Common Reference, CPP Common Type, CPP Compact Exception Model, CPP Compilation Firewalls, CPP Compilation Unit, CPP Complete Object, CPP Complex Number Type, CPP Compound Assignment Operator, CPP Compound Literal, CPP Compound Requirement, CPP Concept Keyword, CPP Concept Map, CPP Concept Predicate, CPP Concrete Type, CPP Conditional Explicit, CPP Conditional Inference, CPP Conditional Operator, CPP Conditional Variable, CPP Conforming Implementation, CPP Conformed Specialization, CPP Conformance Level, CPP Conformance Test Suite, CPP Conjunction Concept, CPP Constant Expression, CPP Constant Initialization, CPP Constant Interval Bound, CPP Const Keyword, CPP Const Member Function, CPP Const Volatile Qualifier, CPP Const_Assert Macro, CPP Consteval Keyword, CPP Constexpr Keyword, CPP Constexpr Constructor, CPP Constexpr Function, CPP Constinit Keyword, CPP Constexpr If Statement, CPP Constraint Expression, CPP Constraint Satisfaction, CPP Constraint_Based Overload Resolution, CPP Constructor Delegation, CPP Constructor Inheritance, CPP Constructor Template, CPP Contextual Conversion, CPP Continue Keyword, CPP Contract Programming, CPP Contravariant Parameter Type, CPP Conversion Function, CPP Conversion Operator, CPP Conversion Sequence, CPP Copy Assignment Operator, CPP Copy Constructor, CPP Copy Ellision, CPP Core Constant Expressions, CPP Core Guidelines, CPP Coroutine Frame, CPP Coroutine Handle, CPP Coroutine State Machine, CPP Coroutine Suspension, CPP Count Algorithm, CPP Covariant Return Type, CPP CRTP (Curiously Recurring Template Pattern), CPP CTAD (Class Template Argument Deduction), CPP CUDA Extensions For [[CPP]], CPP Curly Brace Scope, CPP Custom Deleter in Smart Pointer, CPP Custom Exception, CPP Custom Literal Suffix, CPP Dangling Pointer Detection, CPP Dangling Reference, CPP Data Member Alignment, CPP Data Member Padding, CPP Data Race, CPP Data Segment, CPP Debug Macro, CPP Debug Symbol, CPP Decay Type, CPP Decltype Keyword, CPP Decomposition Declaration, CPP Deduction Guide, CPP Deep Copy, CPP Default Argument, CPP Default Capture, CPP Default Constructor, CPP Default Initialization, CPP Default Member Initializer, CPP Defaulted Function, CPP Defaulted Move Constructor, CPP Deleted Function, CPP Deleter Object, CPP Deletion Overload, CPP Demangled Name, CPP Dependent Base, CPP Dependent Name, CPP Dependent Scope, CPP Dependent Type, CPP Dependent Type Name, CPP Deprecated Attribute, CPP Design Pattern Application, CPP Designated Initializer, CPP Destructor, CPP Device Code in [[CPP Offloading]], CPP Diagnostic Message, CPP Digit Separator, CPP Direct Base Class, CPP Direct Initialization, CPP Directive, CPP Discard Block, CPP Discard Statement, CPP Disjunction Concept, CPP DLL Export, CPP DLL Import, CPP Do Keyword, CPP Do-While Loop, CPP Documented Behavior, CPP Dominance Analysis, CPP Double Keyword, CPP Downcast Operation, CPP Downward Closure, CPP DRY Principle in [[CPP]], CPP Dynamic Allocation, CPP Dynamic Cast Keyword, CPP Dynamic Exception Specification, CPP Dynamic Initialization, CPP Dynamic Linkage, CPP Dynamic Polymorphism, CPP Dynamic Type, CPP Eager Instantiation, CPP EBCDIC Support, CPP Effective Modern [[CPP Book Reference]], CPP Ellipsis Parameter, CPP Empty Base Optimization, CPP Empty Class, CPP Empty Parameter Pack, CPP Enable If Utility, CPP End Iterator, CPP End Of File State, CPP Endl Manipulator, CPP Enumeration Underlying Type, CPP Enumerator, CPP Enum Keyword, CPP Equality Operator, CPP Equivalence Relation, CPP Erased Type, CPP Error Handling Strategy, CPP Error State Indicator, CPP Exception Filter, CPP Exception Guarantee, CPP Exception Handling, CPP Exception Object, CPP Exception Safe Functions, CPP Exception Specification, CPP Exception Translation, CPP Execinfo Integration, CPP Execution Character Set, CPP Execution Policy, CPP Exhaustive Instantiation, CPP Explicit Conversion Operator, CPP Explicit Keyword, CPP Export Keyword, CPP Extern Keyword, CPP External Linkage, CPP External Template, CPP ExternC Linkage, CPP Face-Deletion Operator, CPP False Keyword, CPP Fast Floating-Point Mode, CPP Field Alignment, CPP File Scope, CPP Filebuf Class, CPP Filesystem Directory Iterator, CPP Filesystem Path, CPP Final Specifier, CPP Fixed-Size Array, CPP Fixed-Width Integer, CPP Floating Point Environment, CPP Floating Point Literal, CPP Fold Expression, CPP For Keyword, CPP For Range Loop, CPP Forward Declaration, CPP Forward Iterator, CPP Forward List, CPP Forwarding Reference, CPP Four-Phase Name Lookup, CPP Friend Class, CPP Friend Declaration, CPP Friend Function, CPP Front Insertion Operator, CPP Full Expression, CPP Full Specialization, CPP Function Adapter, CPP Function Call Operator, CPP Function-Like Macro, CPP Function Object, CPP Function Overload, CPP Function Parameter Pack, CPP Function Pointer, CPP Function Template, CPP Function Template Partial Specialization, CPP Function Template Specialization, CPP Garbage Collection Interface, CPP Gcc Extension For [[CPP]], CPP Generalized Constant Expression, CPP Generic Lambda, CPP Generic Programming, CPP Getline Function, CPP Global New Operator, CPP Global Namespace, CPP Global Object, CPP Global Variable, CPP GPU Offloading Support, CPP Greater Comparator, CPP Guaranteed Copy Elision, CPP Guarded Suspension, CPP Half-Open Interval in Iterators, CPP Handler Block, CPP Has Include Preprocessor, CPP Hash Function Object, CPP Heap Allocation, CPP Heuristic Inline, CPP Hidden Friend Idiom, CPP Hidden Implementation Detail, CPP Homogeneous Function Template, CPP Hook Function, CPP I/O Manipulator, CPP I/O State Flag, CPP I/O Stream Buffer, CPP I/O Stream Iterator, CPP If Constexpr, CPP If Keyword, CPP If-Else Chain, CPP Ill-Formed Program, CPP Immediate Function, CPP Implementation-Defined Behavior, CPP Implementation Limit, CPP Import Keyword, CPP Incremental Compilation, CPP Indeterminate Value, CPP Index Sequence, CPP Indirect Call Optimization, CPP Inheritance Chain, CPP Inherited Constructor, CPP Inline Assembly, CPP Inline Keyword, CPP Inline Namespace, CPP Inline Variable, CPP Input Iterator, CPP Integral Constant Expression, CPP Integral Promotion, CPP Integer Division, CPP Integer Literal, CPP Internal Linkage, CPP Intrinsic Function, CPP Invalid Pointer, CPP Invocation Operator, CPP IOS Base, CPP IOS Flags, CPP IOS Format State, CPP IOS Precision, CPP IOS Width, CPP Iostream Synchronization, CPP IPC Mechanisms in [[CPP (Non-OS Generic)]], CPP ISO Standard Committee, CPP IsLiteralType Trait, CPP Iteration Statement, CPP Iterator Adapter, CPP Iterator Category, CPP Iterator Invalidation, CPP Iterator Traits, CPP JIT Compilation for [[CPP]], CPP Just-In-Time Debugging, CPP Key Function, CPP Keyword Recognition, CPP Koenig Lookup, CPP Label Declaration, CPP Lambda Capture, CPP Lambda Closure Type, CPP Lambda Expression, CPP Lambda Introducer, CPP Lambda Object, CPP Language Linkage, CPP Late Template Parsing, CPP Lexical Block, CPP LIFO Semantics, CPP Lifetime Extension of Temporaries, CPP Lifetime Profile, CPP Limit Macro, CPP Link Time Optimization, CPP Linker Script Interaction with [[CPP Symbols]], CPP Linker-Aided Optimization, CPP Linktime Polymorphism, CPP Literal Operator, CPP Literal Suffix, CPP Literal Type, CPP Local Class, CPP Local Static Variable, CPP Lock Guard, CPP Lock-Free Programming, CPP Logic And Operator, CPP Logic Not Operator, CPP Logic Or Operator, CPP Logical Conjunction, CPP Logical Disjunction, CPP Long Double Keyword, CPP Long Keyword, CPP Lookup Rule, CPP Loophole Casting, CPP Low-Level Memory Intrinsics, CPP Lvalue Reference, CPP Lvalue Transformation, CPP Machine Code Generation for [[CPP]], CPP Magic Statics, CPP Magnitude Type, CPP Main Function, CPP Make Shared, CPP Make Unique, CPP Mangling, CPP Map Container, CPP Masked Operation, CPP Maximum Munch Rule, CPP Memento Pattern in [[CPP]], CPP Member Access Operator, CPP Member Initializer List, CPP Member Template, CPP Member Variable Template, CPP Memory Fence, CPP Memory Model, CPP Memory Order, CPP Memory Resource, CPP Metaclasses Proposal, CPP Metaobject Facility, CPP Metaprogramming, CPP MinGW Toolchain, CPP Minimal Perfect Forwarding, CPP Modified UTF-8 Strings in [[CPP Context]], CPP Module Interface Unit, CPP Module Partition, CPP Module Purview, CPP Module Unit, CPP Module-Mapper, CPP Modules TS, CPP Move Assignment Operator, CPP Move Constructor, CPP Move Iterator, CPP Move Semantics, CPP MSVC Extensions, CPP Multiple Inheritance, CPP Multiway Merge, CPP Mutable Keyword, CPP Mutable Lambda, CPP Name Hiding, CPP Name Lookup, CPP Named Requirement, CPP Narrow Character Type, CPP Narrowing Conversion, CPP Namespace Alias, CPP Namespace Keyword, CPP Natvis Debug Visualization, CPP Nested Class, CPP Nested Exception, CPP Nested Lambda, CPP Nested Namespace, CPP Nested Template, CPP New Expression, CPP Nibble Access in Bitset, CPP No Except Keyword, CPP No Return Function, CPP No Unique Address Attribute, CPP Noop Mutex, CPP Normative Reference in Standard, CPP Not Keyword, CPP Not_Eq Keyword, CPP noexcept Operator, CPP Nothrow Guarantee, CPP Null Pointer Constant, CPP Nullptr Keyword, CPP Number Literal, CPP Numeric Limit, CPP ODR (One-Definition Rule), CPP ODR-Use, CPP Opaque Enum Declaration, CPP Open Multi-Methods in [[CPP (Visitor Pattern)]], CPP Operator Delete, CPP Operator Delete[], CPP Operator Function Id, CPP Operator New, CPP Operator New[], CPP Operator Overload, CPP Optional Class Template, CPP Order Statistics Tree (Extension), CPP Ordered Comparison, CPP Ordered Map, CPP Ordered Set, CPP Ordering Category, CPP Ostream Iterator, CPP Out Of Line Definition, CPP Out Parameter Style, CPP Out-Of-Class Member Definition, CPP Output Iterator, CPP Over Alignment Support, CPP Overload Resolution, CPP Overloaded Operator, CPP Overloaded Template, CPP Overriding Function, CPP Package Manager for [[CPP Libraries]], CPP Pair Class Template, CPP Panic Mode Recovery in Parser, CPP Parameter Pack, CPP Parameter Pack Expansion, CPP Parent Class, CPP Partial Ordering of Function Templates, CPP Partial Specialization, CPP Perfect Forwarding, CPP PH (Placeholders) In Templates, CPP Placement Delete, CPP Placement New, CPP Plain Old Data (POD) Type, CPP Pmr Allocator, CPP Pointer Arithmetic, CPP Pointer Decay, CPP Pointer Interconvertibility, CPP Pointer To Member, CPP Polymorphic Allocator, CPP Polymorphic Class, CPP Polymorphic Lambda, CPP Polymorphic Type, CPP Postfix Decrement Operator, CPP Postfix Increment Operator, CPP Precompiled Header, CPP Predefined Macro, CPP Prefix Decrement Operator, CPP Prefix Increment Operator, CPP Preprocessing Directive, CPP Private Base, CPP Private Inheritance, CPP Protected Inheritance, CPP Public Inheritance, CPP Pure Virtual Function, CPP Qualifier Adjustment, CPP Qualified Id, CPP Qualified Lookup, CPP Qualified Name Lookup, CPP Quick_Exit Function, CPP RAII (Resource Acquisition Is Initialization), CPP Random Device, CPP Range Based For Loop, CPP Range Concept, CPP Range-V3 Library Integration, CPP Raw String Literal, CPP Realloc Function Avoidance, CPP Rebind Allocator, CPP Recursion Limit, CPP Redundant Move, CPP Reference Collapsing Rules, CPP Reference Parameter, CPP Reference Wrapper, CPP Reflexpr Keyword, CPP Register Keyword, CPP Regular Type Concept, CPP Reinterpret_Cast Keyword, CPP Relaxed Constraint, CPP Release Mode, CPP Requires Clause, CPP Requires Expression, CPP Requires Keyword, CPP Requirement Body, CPP Requirement Parameter, CPP Resource Leak Detection, CPP Resource Management, CPP Restricted Aliasing, CPP Return Keyword, CPP Return Type Deduction, CPP Reverse Iterator, CPP RIAA (Reverse RAII Approach, Hypothetical), CPP Ring Buffer, CPP RNG (Random Number Generator) Expanded As Random Number Generator, CPP Rule Of Five, CPP Rule Of Three, CPP Runtime Polymorphism, CPP Runtime Type Information, CPP Safe Bool Idiom, CPP Sampling Distribution Function, CPP Sanitizer, CPP Sargable Expression in [[CPP (Hypothetical Term)]], CPP Scalar Replacement of Aggregates, CPP Scenario Testing in [[CPP Unit Tests]], CPP Scope Guard Idiom, CPP Scope Resolution Operator, CPP Scoped Enumeration, CPP Scoped Lock, CPP Scoped Thread, CPP Secondary Template, CPP Segmentation Fault Handling, CPP Selection Statement, CPP Semaphore, CPP Sequence Container, CPP Shallow Copy, CPP Shared Future, CPP Shared Lock, CPP Shared Mutex, CPP Shared Pointer, CPP Short Circuit Evaluation, CPP Short Keyword, CPP Signed Integer Type, CPP Signature (Function), CPP Silent Conversion, CPP Simple Declaration, CPP Single Inheritance, CPP Single Module Unit, CPP Singleton Pattern in [[CPP]], CPP Sized Deallocation, CPP Sized Deallocation Function, CPP Slicing Problem, CPP Slice Array, CPP Smart Pointer, CPP Snowflake Operator (Hypothetical Term), CPP Software Transactional Memory Proposal, CPP Source Code Transformation, CPP Spacer Iterator (Hypothetical Term), CPP Special Member Function, CPP Specialization, CPP SFINAE (Substitution Failure Is Not An Error), CPP Shift Left Operator Overload, CPP Shift Right Operator Overload, CPP Short Lived Object Optimization, CPP Signed Char Type, CPP Signal Handler Invocation, CPP Signature of a Callable, CPP Silent Failure In Templates, CPP Sized Array To Pointer Decay, CPP Slice Iterator (Hypothetical Term), CPP Small Buffer Optimization, CPP Sort Algorithm, CPP Sorting Network Implementation, CPP Source Code Translation Unit, CPP Specialized Allocator, CPP Speculative Load, CPP Spin Lock Implementation, CPP Spurious Wakeup Prevention, CPP SSO (Small String Optimization), CPP Stable Partition, CPP Stack Allocation, CPP Standard Algorithm, CPP Standard Atomic, CPP Standard Backward Compatibility, CPP Standard Basic_String, CPP Standard Bitset, CPP Standard Byte Type, CPP Standard Charconv, CPP Standard Chrono, CPP Standard Codecvt, CPP Standard Compare, CPP Standard Concurrency Support, CPP Standard Condition_Variable, CPP Standard Container Adaptors, CPP Standard Container Erasure, CPP Standard Container Invalidation Rules, CPP Standard Deque, CPP Standard Duration, CPP Standard Dynamic Extent, CPP Standard Execution Policy, CPP Standard Filesystem, CPP Standard Fixed Size Array, CPP Standard Forward_List, CPP Standard Fstream, CPP Standard Function, CPP Standard Future, CPP Standard Hash, CPP Standard Iomanip, CPP Standard Ios, CPP Standard Iostream, CPP Standard Iostream Synchronization, CPP Standard Istream, CPP Standard Iterator, CPP Standard Layout Type, CPP Standard Library, CPP Standard List, CPP Standard Locale, CPP Standard Map, CPP Standard Memory, CPP Standard MultiMap, CPP Standard MultiSet, CPP Standard Mutex, CPP Standard Optional, CPP Standard Ostream, CPP Standard Pair, CPP Standard Priority_Queue, CPP Standard Promise, CPP Standard Queue, CPP Standard Random, CPP Standard Ratio, CPP Standard Raw Storage Iterator, CPP Standard Regex, CPP Standard Relaxed Iterator Concept, CPP Standard Scoped_Allocator_Adaptor, CPP Standard Set, CPP Standard Shared_Future, CPP Standard Shared_Ptr, CPP Standard Span, CPP Standard Stack, CPP Standard Streambuf, CPP Standard String, CPP Standard String_View, CPP Standard System_Error, CPP Standard Template Library (STL), CPP Standard Thread, CPP Standard Tuple, CPP Standard Type Erasure, CPP Standard Type Traits, CPP Standard Unique_Lock, CPP Standard Unique_Ptr, CPP Standard Unordered_Map, CPP Standard Unordered_Multimap, CPP Standard Unordered_Multiset, CPP Standard Unordered_Set, CPP Standard Utility, CPP Standard Valarray, CPP Standard Variant, CPP Standard Vector, CPP Static_assert Keyword, CPP Static Keyword, CPP Static Allocation, CPP Static Cast Keyword, CPP Static Data Member, CPP Static Storage Duration, CPP Storage Class Specifier, CPP Strict Aliasing Rule, CPP String Literal, CPP Stringification Macro, CPP Strong Exception Guarantee, CPP Structured Binding, CPP Subobject, CPP Substitution Failure, CPP Synchronized Pool Resource, CPP Synchronization Primitives, CPP Syntactic Category, CPP SzArray (Hypothetical Term), CPP Template Argument Deduction, CPP Template Class, CPP Template Constrained Function, CPP Template Friend, CPP Template Instantiation, CPP Template Metaprogramming, CPP Template Parameter, CPP Template Parameter Pack Expansion, CPP Template Partial Specialization, CPP Template Specialization, CPP Temporary Materialization, CPP Ternary Operator, CPP This Keyword, CPP Thread Local Keyword, CPP Thread Safe Initialization, CPP Three Way Comparison Operator, CPP Throw Expression, CPP Throw Keyword, CPP Token Concatenation, CPP Token Pasting Operator, CPP Traits Class, CPP Trampoline Function Technique, CPP Translation Unit, CPP Trigraph Sequence, CPP Trivial Class, CPP Trivial Type, CPP True Keyword, CPP Try Keyword, CPP TU (Translation Unit) Expanded As Translation Unit, CPP Type Alias, CPP Type Alias Template, CPP Type Deduction, CPP Type Erasure Idiom, CPP Type Id Expression, CPP Type Parameter Pack, CPP Type Promotion, CPP Type Safe Union, CPP Type Trait, CPP Type Transformation, CPP Type_Safe Enum Idiom, CPP Typename Keyword, CPP Underlying Type, CPP Unicode Literal, CPP Union Keyword, CPP Union Member, CPP Unique Address Optimization, CPP Uninitialized Fill, CPP Uninitialized Memory, CPP Uninitialized Value, CPP Universal Reference, CPP Unnamed Namespace, CPP Unordered Container, CPP Unreachable Code, CPP Unsigned Integer Type, CPP Utility Forward, CPP Value Category, CPP Value Initialization, CPP Variable Template, CPP Variadic Macro, CPP Variadic Template, CPP Vectorization Strategies, CPP Virtual Base Class, CPP Virtual Dispatch, CPP Virtual Function Table (VFT), CPP Virtual Function, CPP Virtual Inheritance, CPP Visible Entity, CPP Visibility Attribute, CPP Volatile Keyword, CPP Wchar_T Keyword, CPP Weak Symbol, CPP Wide Character Literal, CPP Wide String Literal, CPP Wide-Char Stream, CPP Widen Function, CPP Widening Conversion, CPP Working Draft of [[CPP Standard]], CPP Xor Keyword, CPP Xor_Eq Keyword, CPP Zero Initialization

C Plus Plus | C++: Effective CPP | Effective C++, C Plus Plus Best Practices | C++ Best Practices, CPP Core Guidelines (CG) by Bjarne Stroustrup and Herb Sutter | C++ Core Guidelines (CG) by Bjarne Stroustrup and Herb Sutter, C Plus Plus Fundamentals | C++ Fundamentals, C Plus Plus Inventor | C++ Inventor - C Plus Plus Language Designer | C++ Language Designer: Bjarne Stroustrup in 1985; C Plus Plus Keywords | C++ Keywords, CPP Built-In Data Types | C++ Built-In Data Types, C Plus Plus Data Structures | C++ Data Structures (CPP Containers) - C Plus Plus Algorithms | C++ Algorithms, C Plus Plus Syntax | C++ Syntax, C Plus Plus OOP | C++ OOP - C Plus Plus Design Patterns | C++ Design Patterns, Clean C Plus Plus | Clean C++ - C Plus Plus Style Guide | C++ Style Guide - C Plus Plus BDD | C++ BDD, C Plus Plus Standards | C++ Standards (C Plus Plus 23 | C++ 23, C Plus Plus 20 | C++ 20, C Plus Plus 17 | C++ 17, C Plus Plus 14 | C++ 14, C Plus Plus 11 | C++ 11, C Plus Plus 03 | C++ 03, C Plus Plus 98 | C++ 98), Bjarne Stroustrup's C Plus Plus Glossary | Bjarne Stroustrup's C++ Glossary - Glossaire de CCP - French, CppReference.com, CPlusPlus.com, ISOcpp.org, C Plus Plus Compilers | C++ Compilers (Compiler Explorer, MinGW), C Plus Plus IDEs | C++ IDEs, C Plus Plus Development Tools | C++ Development Tools, C Plus Plus Linter | C++ Linter, C Plus Plus Debugging | C++ Debugging, C Plus Plus Modules | C++ Modules (C Plus Plus 20 | C++20), C Plus Plus Packages | C++ Packages, C Plus Plus Package Manager | C++ Package Manager (Conan - the C/C Plus Plus Package Manager | Conan - the C/C++ Package Manager), C Plus Plus Standard Library | C++ Standard Library, C Plus Plus Libraries | C++ Libraries, C Plus Plus Frameworks | C++ Frameworks, C Plus Plus DevOps | C++ DevOps - C Plus Plus SRE | C++ SRE, C Plus Plus CI/CD | C++ CI/CD (C Plus Plus Build Pipeline | C++ Build Pipeline), C Plus Plus Data Science | C++ Data Science - C Plus Plus DataOps | C++ DataOps, C Plus Plus Machine Learning | C++ Machine Learning, C Plus Plus Deep Learning | C++ Deep Learning, Functional C Plus Plus | Functional C++, C Plus Plus Concurrency | C++ Concurrency, C Plus Plus History | C++ History, C Plus Plus Topics | C++ Topics, C Plus Plus Bibliography | C++ Bibliography, Manning CPP Series | Manning C++ Series, C Plus Plus Courses | C++ Courses, CppCon, C Plus Plus Research | C++ Research, C Plus Plus GitHub | C++ GitHub, Written in C Plus Plus | Written in C++, C Plus Plus Popularity | C++ Popularity, C Plus Plus Awesome | C++ Awesome, C Plus Plus Versions | C++ Versions. (navbar_cplusplus – see also navbar_cpp_containers, navbar_cppcon, navbar_cpp_core_guidelines, navbar_cpp23, navbar_cpp20, navbar_cpp17, navbar_cpp14, navbar_cpp11)

SYI LU SENG E MU CHYWE YE. NAN. WEI LA YE. WEI LA YE. SA WA HE.

Table of Contents